Debug Info: clean up usage of Verify.
No functionality change. It should suffice to check the type of a debug info
metadata, instead of calling Verify.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@185383 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp b/lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp
index ab61b88..9a9df49 100644
--- a/lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp
+++ b/lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@
/// createReferenceType - Create debugging information entry for a reference
/// type.
DIDerivedType DIBuilder::createReferenceType(unsigned Tag, DIType RTy) {
- assert(RTy.Verify() && "Unable to create reference type");
+ assert(RTy.isType() && "Unable to create reference type");
// References are encoded in DIDerivedType format.
Value *Elts[] = {
GetTagConstant(VMContext, Tag),
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@
DIDerivedType DIBuilder::createTypedef(DIType Ty, StringRef Name, DIFile File,
unsigned LineNo, DIDescriptor Context) {
// typedefs are encoded in DIDerivedType format.
- assert(Ty.Verify() && "Invalid typedef type!");
+ assert(Ty.isType() && "Invalid typedef type!");
Value *Elts[] = {
GetTagConstant(VMContext, dwarf::DW_TAG_typedef),
File.getFileNode(),
@@ -357,8 +357,8 @@
/// createFriend - Create debugging information entry for a 'friend'.
DIDerivedType DIBuilder::createFriend(DIType Ty, DIType FriendTy) {
// typedefs are encoded in DIDerivedType format.
- assert(Ty.Verify() && "Invalid type!");
- assert(FriendTy.Verify() && "Invalid friend type!");
+ assert(Ty.isType() && "Invalid type!");
+ assert(FriendTy.isType() && "Invalid friend type!");
Value *Elts[] = {
GetTagConstant(VMContext, dwarf::DW_TAG_friend),
NULL,
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@
/// inheritance relationship between two types.
DIDerivedType DIBuilder::createInheritance(
DIType Ty, DIType BaseTy, uint64_t BaseOffset, unsigned Flags) {
- assert(Ty.Verify() && "Unable to create inheritance");
+ assert(Ty.isType() && "Unable to create inheritance");
// TAG_inheritance is encoded in DIDerivedType format.
Value *Elts[] = {
GetTagConstant(VMContext, dwarf::DW_TAG_inheritance),
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@
DIArray Elements,
MDNode *VTableHolder,
MDNode *TemplateParams) {
- assert((!Context || Context.Verify()) &&
+ assert((!Context || Context.isScope() || Context.isType()) &&
"createClassType should be called with a valid Context");
// TAG_class_type is encoded in DICompositeType format.
Value *Elts[] = {
@@ -616,7 +616,8 @@
TemplateParams
};
DICompositeType R(MDNode::get(VMContext, Elts));
- assert(R.Verify() && "createClassType should return a verifiable DIType");
+ assert(R.isCompositeType() &&
+ "createClassType should return a DICompositeType");
return R;
}
@@ -648,7 +649,8 @@
NULL,
};
DICompositeType R(MDNode::get(VMContext, Elts));
- assert(R.Verify() && "createStructType should return a verifiable DIType");
+ assert(R.isCompositeType() &&
+ "createStructType should return a DICompositeType");
return R;
}
@@ -861,8 +863,8 @@
ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(VMContext), RuntimeLang)
};
MDNode *Node = MDNode::getTemporary(VMContext, Elts);
- assert(DIType(Node).Verify() &&
- "createForwardDecl result should be verifiable");
+ assert(DIType(Node).isType() &&
+ "createForwardDecl result should be a DIType");
return DIType(Node);
}
@@ -953,9 +955,9 @@
bool AlwaysPreserve, unsigned Flags,
unsigned ArgNo) {
DIDescriptor Context(getNonCompileUnitScope(Scope));
- assert((!Context || Context.Verify()) &&
+ assert((!Context || Context.isScope()) &&
"createLocalVariable should be called with a valid Context");
- assert(Ty.Verify() &&
+ assert(Ty.isType() &&
"createLocalVariable should be called with a valid type");
Value *Elts[] = {
GetTagConstant(VMContext, Tag),
@@ -976,8 +978,8 @@
NamedMDNode *FnLocals = getOrInsertFnSpecificMDNode(M, Fn);
FnLocals->addOperand(Node);
}
- assert(DIVariable(Node).Verify() &&
- "createLocalVariable should return a verifiable DIVariable");
+ assert(DIVariable(Node).isVariable() &&
+ "createLocalVariable should return a valid DIVariable");
return DIVariable(Node);
}
@@ -1046,7 +1048,7 @@
if (isDefinition)
AllSubprograms.push_back(Node);
DISubprogram S(Node);
- assert(S.Verify() && "createFunction should return a valid DISubprogram");
+ assert(S.isSubprogram() && "createFunction should return a valid DISubprogram");
return S;
}
@@ -1094,7 +1096,7 @@
if (isDefinition)
AllSubprograms.push_back(Node);
DISubprogram S(Node);
- assert(S.Verify() && "createMethod should return a valid DISubprogram");
+ assert(S.isSubprogram() && "createMethod should return a valid DISubprogram");
return S;
}