When checking whether the special handling for an addrec increment which
doesn't dominate the header is needed, don't check whether the increment
expression has computable loop evolution. While the operands of an
addrec are required to be loop-invariant, they're not required to
dominate any part of the loop. This fixes PR6914.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102389 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
index b90f051..e9a634b 100644
--- a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
+++ b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp
@@ -995,8 +995,7 @@
// Strip off any non-loop-dominating component from the addrec step.
const SCEV *Step = Normalized->getStepRecurrence(SE);
const SCEV *PostLoopScale = 0;
- if (!Step->hasComputableLoopEvolution(L) &&
- !Step->dominates(L->getHeader(), SE.DT)) {
+ if (!Step->dominates(L->getHeader(), SE.DT)) {
PostLoopScale = Step;
Step = SE.getIntegerSCEV(1, Normalized->getType());
Normalized =