Revise definition of part_select. The wrapping behavior is not useful so
in the reverse case the only difference is that the bits are returned in
reverse order.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@37035 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/docs/LangRef.html b/docs/LangRef.html
index 58e0e3c..314cdb9 100644
--- a/docs/LangRef.html
+++ b/docs/LangRef.html
@@ -4655,16 +4655,11 @@
<li>A mask of the retained bits is created by shifting a -1 value.</li>
<li>The mask is ANDed with <tt>%val</tt> to produce the result.
</ol>
-<p>In reverse mode, a similar computation is made except that:</p>
-<ol>
- <li>The bits selected wrap around to include both the highest and lowest bits.
- For example, part.select(i16 X, 4, 7) selects bits from X with a mask of
- 0x00F0 (forwards case) while part.select(i16 X, 8, 3) selects bits from X
- with a mask of 0xFF0F.</li>
- <li>The bits returned in the reverse case are reversed. So, if X has the value
- 0x6ACF and we apply part.select(i16 X, 8, 3) to it, we get back the value
- 0x0A6F.</li>
-</ol>
+<p>In reverse mode, a similar computation is made except that the bits are
+returned in the reverse order. So, for example, if <tt>X</tt> has the value
+<tt>i16 0x0ACF (101011001111)</tt> and we apply
+<tt>part.select(i16 X, 8, 3)</tt> to it, we get back the value
+<tt>i16 0x0026 (000000100110)</tt>.</p>
</div>
<div class="doc_subsubsection">