Make simplifycfg reprocess newly formed "br (cond1 | cond2)" conditions
when simplifying, allowing them to be eagerly turned into switches.  This
is the last step required to get "Example 7" from this blog post:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320

On X86, we now generate this machine code, which (to my eye) seems better
than the ICC generated code:

_crud:                                  ## @crud
## BB#0:                                ## %entry
	cmpb	$33, %dil
	jb	LBB0_4
## BB#1:                                ## %switch.early.test
	addb	$-34, %dil
	cmpb	$58, %dil
	ja	LBB0_3
## BB#2:                                ## %switch.early.test
	movzbl	%dil, %eax
	movabsq	$288230376537592865, %rcx ## imm = 0x400000017001421
	btq	%rax, %rcx
	jb	LBB0_4
LBB0_3:                                 ## %lor.rhs
	xorl	%eax, %eax
	ret
LBB0_4:                                 ## %lor.end
	movl	$1, %eax
	ret



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121690 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
index 503e5bc..18c2905 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
@@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@
   // must be at the front of the block.
   BasicBlock::iterator FrontIt = BB->front();
   // Ignore dbg intrinsics.
-  while(isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(FrontIt))
+  while (isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(FrontIt))
     ++FrontIt;
     
   // Allow a single instruction to be hoisted in addition to the compare
@@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@
         UsedValues.erase(Pair.first);
         if (UsedValues.empty()) break;
         
-        if (Instruction* I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Pair.first)) {
+        if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Pair.first)) {
           for (Instruction::op_iterator OI = I->op_begin(), OE = I->op_end();
                OI != OE; ++OI)
             Worklist.push_back(std::make_pair(OI->get(), Pair.second+1));
@@ -1469,9 +1469,16 @@
     
     // If we need to invert the condition in the pred block to match, do so now.
     if (InvertPredCond) {
-      Value *NewCond =
-        BinaryOperator::CreateNot(PBI->getCondition(),
+      Value *NewCond = PBI->getCondition();
+      
+      if (NewCond->hasOneUse() && isa<CmpInst>(NewCond)) {
+        CmpInst *CI = cast<CmpInst>(NewCond);
+        CI->setPredicate(CI->getInversePredicate());
+      } else {
+        NewCond = BinaryOperator::CreateNot(NewCond,
                                   PBI->getCondition()->getName()+".not", PBI);
+      }
+      
       PBI->setCondition(NewCond);
       BasicBlock *OldTrue = PBI->getSuccessor(0);
       BasicBlock *OldFalse = PBI->getSuccessor(1);
@@ -1507,7 +1514,7 @@
       AddPredecessorToBlock(FalseDest, PredBlock, BB);
       PBI->setSuccessor(1, FalseDest);
     }
-    return true;
+    return SimplifyCFG(PBI->getParent()) | true;
   }
   return false;
 }
diff --git a/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/switch_create.ll b/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/switch_create.ll
index d5347e8..ce82936 100644
--- a/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/switch_create.ll
+++ b/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/switch_create.ll
@@ -203,5 +203,70 @@
 ; CHECK:     i8 97, label %if.then
 ; CHECK:   ]
 ; CHECK:   %A = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ 42, %switch.early.test ], [ 42, %N ], [ 42, %switch.early.test ]
-
 }
+
+define i32 @test9(i8 zeroext %c) nounwind ssp noredzone {
+entry:
+  %cmp = icmp ult i8 %c, 33
+  br i1 %cmp, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false
+
+lor.lhs.false:                                    ; preds = %entry
+  %cmp4 = icmp eq i8 %c, 46
+  br i1 %cmp4, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false6
+
+lor.lhs.false6:                                   ; preds = %lor.lhs.false
+  %cmp9 = icmp eq i8 %c, 44
+  br i1 %cmp9, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false11
+
+lor.lhs.false11:                                  ; preds = %lor.lhs.false6
+  %cmp14 = icmp eq i8 %c, 58
+  br i1 %cmp14, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false16
+
+lor.lhs.false16:                                  ; preds = %lor.lhs.false11
+  %cmp19 = icmp eq i8 %c, 59
+  br i1 %cmp19, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false21
+
+lor.lhs.false21:                                  ; preds = %lor.lhs.false16
+  %cmp24 = icmp eq i8 %c, 60
+  br i1 %cmp24, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false26
+
+lor.lhs.false26:                                  ; preds = %lor.lhs.false21
+  %cmp29 = icmp eq i8 %c, 62
+  br i1 %cmp29, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false31
+
+lor.lhs.false31:                                  ; preds = %lor.lhs.false26
+  %cmp34 = icmp eq i8 %c, 34
+  br i1 %cmp34, label %lor.end, label %lor.lhs.false36
+
+lor.lhs.false36:                                  ; preds = %lor.lhs.false31
+  %cmp39 = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
+  br i1 %cmp39, label %lor.end, label %lor.rhs
+
+lor.rhs:                                          ; preds = %lor.lhs.false36
+  %cmp43 = icmp eq i8 %c, 39
+  br label %lor.end
+
+lor.end:                                          ; preds = %lor.rhs, %lor.lhs.false36, %lor.lhs.false31, %lor.lhs.false26, %lor.lhs.false21, %lor.lhs.false16, %lor.lhs.false11, %lor.lhs.false6, %lor.lhs.false, %entry
+  %0 = phi i1 [ true, %lor.lhs.false36 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false31 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false26 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false21 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false16 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false11 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false6 ], [ true, %lor.lhs.false ], [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp43, %lor.rhs ]
+  %conv46 = zext i1 %0 to i32
+  ret i32 %conv46
+  
+; CHECK: @test9
+; CHECK:   %cmp = icmp ult i8 %c, 33
+; CHECK:   br i1 %cmp, label %lor.end, label %switch.early.test
+
+; CHECK: switch.early.test:
+; CHECK:   switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
+; CHECK:     i8 46, label %lor.end
+; CHECK:     i8 44, label %lor.end
+; CHECK:     i8 58, label %lor.end
+; CHECK:     i8 59, label %lor.end
+; CHECK:     i8 60, label %lor.end
+; CHECK:     i8 62, label %lor.end
+; CHECK:     i8 34, label %lor.end
+; CHECK:     i8 92, label %lor.end
+; CHECK:     i8 39, label %lor.end
+; CHECK:   ]
+}
+
+