Some ARM implementaions, e.g. A-series, does return stack prediction. That is,
the processor keeps a return addresses stack (RAS) which stores the address
and the instruction execution state of the instruction after a function-call
type branch instruction.
Calling a "noreturn" function with normal call instructions (e.g. bl) can
corrupt RAS and causes 100% return misprediction so LLVM should use a
unconditional branch instead. i.e.
mov lr, pc
b _foo
The "mov lr, pc" is issued in order to get proper backtrace.
rdar://8979299
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151623 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Target/CellSPU/SPUISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/CellSPU/SPUISelLowering.cpp
index 4b57025..3d2b32d 100644
--- a/lib/Target/CellSPU/SPUISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/CellSPU/SPUISelLowering.cpp
@@ -83,8 +83,9 @@
Op.getNode()->getValueType(0).getTypeForEVT(*DAG.getContext());
std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> CallInfo =
TLI.LowerCallTo(InChain, RetTy, isSigned, !isSigned, false, false,
- 0, TLI.getLibcallCallingConv(LC), false,
- /*isReturnValueUsed=*/true,
+ 0, TLI.getLibcallCallingConv(LC),
+ /*isTailCall=*/false,
+ /*doesNotRet=*/false, /*isReturnValueUsed=*/true,
Callee, Args, DAG, Op.getDebugLoc());
return CallInfo.first;
@@ -1274,7 +1275,7 @@
SDValue
SPUTargetLowering::LowerCall(SDValue Chain, SDValue Callee,
CallingConv::ID CallConv, bool isVarArg,
- bool &isTailCall,
+ bool doesNotRet, bool &isTailCall,
const SmallVectorImpl<ISD::OutputArg> &Outs,
const SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &OutVals,
const SmallVectorImpl<ISD::InputArg> &Ins,