Some ARM implementaions, e.g. A-series, does return stack prediction. That is,
the processor keeps a return addresses stack (RAS) which stores the address
and the instruction execution state of the instruction after a function-call
type branch instruction.
Calling a "noreturn" function with normal call instructions (e.g. bl) can
corrupt RAS and causes 100% return misprediction so LLVM should use a
unconditional branch instead. i.e.
mov lr, pc
b _foo
The "mov lr, pc" is issued in order to get proper backtrace.
rdar://8979299
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151623 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Target/Mips/MipsISelLowering.h b/lib/Target/Mips/MipsISelLowering.h
index 7cd5110..143ad2a 100644
--- a/lib/Target/Mips/MipsISelLowering.h
+++ b/lib/Target/Mips/MipsISelLowering.h
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
virtual SDValue
LowerCall(SDValue Chain, SDValue Callee,
CallingConv::ID CallConv, bool isVarArg,
- bool &isTailCall,
+ bool doesNotRet, bool &isTailCall,
const SmallVectorImpl<ISD::OutputArg> &Outs,
const SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &OutVals,
const SmallVectorImpl<ISD::InputArg> &Ins,