blob: a99e46e5b5801c5dc8acfb113542533125e26cd5 [file] [log] [blame]
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +00001<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2 "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3<html>
4<head>
5 <link rel="stylesheet" href="llvm.css" type="text/css">
6 <title>A Few Coding Standards</title>
7</head>
8<body>
9
10<div class="doc_title">
11 A Few Coding Standards
12</div>
13
14<ol>
15 <li><a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></li>
16 <li><a href="#mechanicalissues">Mechanical Source Issues</a>
17 <ol>
18 <li><a href="#sourceformating">Source Code Formatting</a>
19 <ol>
20 <li><a href="#scf_commenting">Commenting</a></li>
21 <li><a href="#scf_commentformat">Comment Formatting</a></li>
22 <li><a href="#scf_includes"><tt>#include</tt> Style</a></li>
23 <li><a href="#scf_codewidth">Source Code Width</a></li>
24 <li><a href="#scf_spacestabs">Use Spaces Instead of Tabs</a></li>
25 <li><a href="#scf_indentation">Indent Code Consistently</a></li>
26 </ol></li>
27 <li><a href="#compilerissues">Compiler Issues</a>
28 <ol>
29 <li><a href="#ci_warningerrors">Treat Compiler Warnings Like
30 Errors</a></li>
31 <li><a href="#ci_portable_code">Write Portable Code</a></li>
32 <li><a href="#ci_class_struct">Use of class/struct Keywords</a></li>
33 </ol></li>
34 </ol></li>
35 <li><a href="#styleissues">Style Issues</a>
36 <ol>
37 <li><a href="#macro">The High Level Issues</a>
38 <ol>
39 <li><a href="#hl_module">A Public Header File <b>is</b> a
40 Module</a></li>
41 <li><a href="#hl_dontinclude">#include as Little as Possible</a></li>
42 <li><a href="#hl_privateheaders">Keep "internal" Headers
43 Private</a></li>
44 <li><a href="#ll_iostream"><tt>#include &lt;iostream&gt;</tt> is
45 <em>forbidden</em></a></li>
46 </ol></li>
47 <li><a href="#micro">The Low Level Issues</a>
48 <ol>
49 <li><a href="#ll_assert">Assert Liberally</a></li>
50 <li><a href="#ll_ns_std">Do not use 'using namespace std'</a></li>
51 <li><a href="#ll_virtual_anch">Provide a virtual method anchor for
52 classes in headers</a></li>
53 <li><a href="#ll_preincrement">Prefer Preincrement</a></li>
54 <li><a href="#ll_avoidendl">Avoid <tt>std::endl</tt></a></li>
55 </ol></li>
56 </ol></li>
57 <li><a href="#seealso">See Also</a></li>
58</ol>
59
60<div class="doc_author">
61 <p>Written by <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a> and
62 <a href="mailto:void@nondot.org">Bill Wendling</a></p>
63</div>
64
65
66<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
67<div class="doc_section">
68 <a name="introduction">Introduction</a>
69</div>
70<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
71
72<div class="doc_text">
73
74<p>This document attempts to describe a few coding standards that are being used
75in the LLVM source tree. Although no coding standards should be regarded as
76absolute requirements to be followed in all instances, coding standards can be
77useful.</p>
78
79<p>This document intentionally does not prescribe fixed standards for religious
80issues such as brace placement and space usage. For issues like this, follow
81the golden rule:</p>
82
83<blockquote>
84
85<p><b><a name="goldenrule">If you are adding a significant body of source to a
86project, feel free to use whatever style you are most comfortable with. If you
87are extending, enhancing, or bug fixing already implemented code, use the style
88that is already being used so that the source is uniform and easy to
89follow.</a></b></p>
90
91</blockquote>
92
93<p>The ultimate goal of these guidelines is the increase readability and
94maintainability of our common source base. If you have suggestions for topics to
95be included, please mail them to <a
96href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris</a>.</p>
97
98</div>
99
100<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
101<div class="doc_section">
102 <a name="mechanicalissues">Mechanical Source Issues</a>
103</div>
104<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
105
106<!-- ======================================================================= -->
107<div class="doc_subsection">
108 <a name="sourceformating">Source Code Formatting</a>
109</div>
110
111<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
112<div class="doc_subsubsection">
113 <a name="scf_commenting">Commenting</a>
114</div>
115
116<div class="doc_text">
117
118<p>Comments are one critical part of readability and maintainability. Everyone
119knows they should comment, so should you. Although we all should probably
120comment our code more than we do, there are a few very critical places that
121documentation is very useful:</p>
122
123<b>File Headers</b>
124
125<p>Every source file should have a header on it that describes the basic
126purpose of the file. If a file does not have a header, it should not be
127checked into Subversion. Most source trees will probably have a standard
128file header format. The standard format for the LLVM source tree looks like
129this:</p>
130
131<div class="doc_code">
132<pre>
133//===-- llvm/Instruction.h - Instruction class definition -------*- C++ -*-===//
134//
135// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
136//
Chris Lattnerfb5959f2007-12-29 19:56:08 +0000137// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
138// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000139//
140//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
141//
142// This file contains the declaration of the Instruction class, which is the
143// base class for all of the VM instructions.
144//
145//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
146</pre>
147</div>
148
Chris Lattnerfb5959f2007-12-29 19:56:08 +0000149<p>A few things to note about this particular format: The "<tt>-*- C++
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000150-*-</tt>" string on the first line is there to tell Emacs that the source file
151is a C++ file, not a C file (Emacs assumes .h files are C files by default).
152Note that this tag is not necessary in .cpp files. The name of the file is also
153on the first line, along with a very short description of the purpose of the
154file. This is important when printing out code and flipping though lots of
155pages.</p>
156
Chris Lattnerfb5959f2007-12-29 19:56:08 +0000157<p>The next section in the file is a concise note that defines the license
158that the file is released under. This makes it perfectly clear what terms the
159source code can be distributed under and should not be modified in any way.</p>
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000160
161<p>The main body of the description does not have to be very long in most cases.
162Here it's only two lines. If an algorithm is being implemented or something
163tricky is going on, a reference to the paper where it is published should be
164included, as well as any notes or "gotchas" in the code to watch out for.</p>
165
166<b>Class overviews</b>
167
168<p>Classes are one fundamental part of a good object oriented design. As such,
169a class definition should have a comment block that explains what the class is
170used for... if it's not obvious. If it's so completely obvious your grandma
171could figure it out, it's probably safe to leave it out. Naming classes
172something sane goes a long ways towards avoiding writing documentation.</p>
173
174
175<b>Method information</b>
176
177<p>Methods defined in a class (as well as any global functions) should also be
178documented properly. A quick note about what it does any a description of the
179borderline behaviour is all that is necessary here (unless something
180particularly tricky or insideous is going on). The hope is that people can
181figure out how to use your interfaces without reading the code itself... that is
182the goal metric.</p>
183
184<p>Good things to talk about here are what happens when something unexpected
185happens: does the method return null? Abort? Format your hard disk?</p>
186
187</div>
188
189<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
190<div class="doc_subsubsection">
191 <a name="scf_commentformat">Comment Formatting</a>
192</div>
193
194<div class="doc_text">
195
196<p>In general, prefer C++ style (<tt>//</tt>) comments. They take less space,
197require less typing, don't have nesting problems, etc. There are a few cases
198when it is useful to use C style (<tt>/* */</tt>) comments however:</p>
199
200<ol>
201 <li>When writing a C code: Obviously if you are writing C code, use C style
202 comments.</li>
203 <li>When writing a header file that may be <tt>#include</tt>d by a C source
204 file.</li>
205 <li>When writing a source file that is used by a tool that only accepts C
206 style comments.</li>
207</ol>
208
209<p>To comment out a large block of code, use <tt>#if 0</tt> and <tt>#endif</tt>.
210These nest properly and are better behaved in general than C style comments.</p>
211
212</div>
213
214<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
215<div class="doc_subsubsection">
216 <a name="scf_includes"><tt>#include</tt> Style</a>
217</div>
218
219<div class="doc_text">
220
221<p>Immediately after the <a href="#scf_commenting">header file comment</a> (and
222include guards if working on a header file), the <a
223href="#hl_dontinclude">minimal</a> list of <tt>#include</tt>s required by the
224file should be listed. We prefer these <tt>#include</tt>s to be listed in this
225order:</p>
226
227<ol>
228 <li><a href="#mmheader">Main Module header</a></li>
229 <li><a href="#hl_privateheaders">Local/Private Headers</a></li>
230 <li><tt>llvm/*</tt></li>
231 <li><tt>llvm/Analysis/*</tt></li>
232 <li><tt>llvm/Assembly/*</tt></li>
233 <li><tt>llvm/Bytecode/*</tt></li>
234 <li><tt>llvm/CodeGen/*</tt></li>
235 <li>...</li>
236 <li><tt>Support/*</tt></li>
237 <li><tt>Config/*</tt></li>
238 <li>System <tt>#includes</tt></li>
239</ol>
240
241<p>... and each catagory should be sorted by name.</p>
242
243<p><a name="mmheader">The "Main Module Header"</a> file applies to .cpp file
244which implement an interface defined by a .h file. This <tt>#include</tt>
245should always be included <b>first</b> regardless of where it lives on the file
246system. By including a header file first in the .cpp files that implement the
247interfaces, we ensure that the header does not have any hidden dependencies
248which are not explicitly #included in the header, but should be. It is also a
249form of documentation in the .cpp file to indicate where the interfaces it
250implements are defined.</p>
251
252</div>
253
254<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
255<div class="doc_subsubsection">
256 <a name="scf_codewidth">Source Code Width</a>
257</div>
258
259<div class="doc_text">
260
261<p>Write your code to fit within 80 columns of text. This helps those of us who
262like to print out code and look at your code in an xterm without resizing
263it.</p>
264
265</div>
266
267<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
268<div class="doc_subsubsection">
269 <a name="scf_spacestabs">Use Spaces Instead of Tabs</a>
270</div>
271
272<div class="doc_text">
273
274<p>In all cases, prefer spaces to tabs in source files. People have different
275prefered indentation levels, and different styles of indentation that they
276like... this is fine. What isn't is that different editors/viewers expand tabs
277out to different tab stops. This can cause your code to look completely
278unreadable, and it is not worth dealing with.</p>
279
280<p>As always, follow the <a href="#goldenrule">Golden Rule</a> above: follow the
281style of existing code if your are modifying and extending it. If you like four
282spaces of indentation, <b>DO NOT</b> do that in the middle of a chunk of code
283with two spaces of indentation. Also, do not reindent a whole source file: it
284makes for incredible diffs that are absolutely worthless.</p>
285
286</div>
287
288<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
289<div class="doc_subsubsection">
290 <a name="scf_indentation">Indent Code Consistently</a>
291</div>
292
293<div class="doc_text">
294
295<p>Okay, your first year of programming you were told that indentation is
296important. If you didn't believe and internalize this then, now is the time.
297Just do it.</p>
298
299</div>
300
301
302<!-- ======================================================================= -->
303<div class="doc_subsection">
304 <a name="compilerissues">Compiler Issues</a>
305</div>
306
307
308<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
309<div class="doc_subsubsection">
310 <a name="ci_warningerrors">Treat Compiler Warnings Like Errors</a>
311</div>
312
313<div class="doc_text">
314
315<p>If your code has compiler warnings in it, something is wrong: you aren't
316casting values correctly, your have "questionable" constructs in your code, or
317you are doing something legitimately wrong. Compiler warnings can cover up
318legitimate errors in output and make dealing with a translation unit
319difficult.</p>
320
321<p>It is not possible to prevent all warnings from all compilers, nor is it
322desirable. Instead, pick a standard compiler (like <tt>gcc</tt>) that provides
323a good thorough set of warnings, and stick to them. At least in the case of
324<tt>gcc</tt>, it is possible to work around any spurious errors by changing the
325syntax of the code slightly. For example, an warning that annoys me occurs when
326I write code like this:</p>
327
328<div class="doc_code">
329<pre>
330if (V = getValue()) {
331 ...
332}
333</pre>
334</div>
335
336<p><tt>gcc</tt> will warn me that I probably want to use the <tt>==</tt>
337operator, and that I probably mistyped it. In most cases, I haven't, and I
338really don't want the spurious errors. To fix this particular problem, I
339rewrite the code like this:</p>
340
341<div class="doc_code">
342<pre>
343if ((V = getValue())) {
344 ...
345}
346</pre>
347</div>
348
349<p>...which shuts <tt>gcc</tt> up. Any <tt>gcc</tt> warning that annoys you can
350be fixed by massaging the code appropriately.</p>
351
352<p>These are the <tt>gcc</tt> warnings that I prefer to enable: <tt>-Wall
353-Winline -W -Wwrite-strings -Wno-unused</tt></p>
354
355</div>
356
357<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
358<div class="doc_subsubsection">
359 <a name="ci_portable_code">Write Portable Code</a>
360</div>
361
362<div class="doc_text">
363
364<p>In almost all cases, it is possible and within reason to write completely
365portable code. If there are cases where it isn't possible to write portable
366code, isolate it behind a well defined (and well documented) interface.</p>
367
368<p>In practice, this means that you shouldn't assume much about the host
369compiler, including its support for "high tech" features like partial
370specialization of templates. In fact, Visual C++ 6 could be an important target
371for our work in the future, and we don't want to have to rewrite all of our code
372to support it.</p>
373
374</div>
375
376<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
377<div class="doc_subsubsection">
378<a name="ci_class_struct">Use of <tt>class</tt> and <tt>struct</tt> Keywords</a>
379</div>
380<div class="doc_text">
381
382<p>In C++, the <tt>class</tt> and <tt>struct</tt> keywords can be used almost
383interchangeably. The only difference is when they are used to declare a class:
384<tt>class</tt> makes all members private by default while <tt>struct</tt> makes
385all members public by default.</p>
386
387<p>Unfortunately, not all compilers follow the rules and some will generate
388different symbols based on whether <tt>class</tt> or <tt>struct</tt> was used to
389declare the symbol. This can lead to problems at link time.</p>
390
391<p>So, the rule for LLVM is to always use the <tt>class</tt> keyword, unless
392<b>all</b> members are public, in which case <tt>struct</tt> is allowed.</p>
393
394</div>
395
396<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
397<div class="doc_section">
398 <a name="styleissues">Style Issues</a>
399</div>
400<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
401
402
403<!-- ======================================================================= -->
404<div class="doc_subsection">
405 <a name="macro">The High Level Issues</a>
406</div>
407
408
409<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
410<div class="doc_subsubsection">
411 <a name="hl_module">A Public Header File <b>is</b> a Module</a>
412</div>
413
414<div class="doc_text">
415
416<p>C++ doesn't do too well in the modularity department. There is no real
417encapsulation or data hiding (unless you use expensive protocol classes), but it
418is what we have to work with. When you write a public header file (in the LLVM
419source tree, they live in the top level "include" directory), you are defining a
420module of functionality.</p>
421
422<p>Ideally, modules should be completely independent of each other, and their
423header files should only include the absolute minimum number of headers
424possible. A module is not just a class, a function, or a namespace: <a
425href="http://www.cuj.com/articles/2000/0002/0002c/0002c.htm">it's a collection
426of these</a> that defines an interface. This interface may be several
427functions, classes or data structures, but the important issue is how they work
428together.</p>
429
430<p>In general, a module should be implemented with one or more <tt>.cpp</tt>
431files. Each of these <tt>.cpp</tt> files should include the header that defines
432their interface first. This ensure that all of the dependences of the module
433header have been properly added to the module header itself, and are not
434implicit. System headers should be included after user headers for a
435translation unit.</p>
436
437</div>
438
439<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
440<div class="doc_subsubsection">
441 <a name="hl_dontinclude"><tt>#include</tt> as Little as Possible</a>
442</div>
443
444<div class="doc_text">
445
446<p><tt>#include</tt> hurts compile time performance. Don't do it unless you
447have to, especially in header files.</p>
448
449<p>But wait, sometimes you need to have the definition of a class to use it, or
450to inherit from it. In these cases go ahead and <tt>#include</tt> that header
451file. Be aware however that there are many cases where you don't need to have
452the full definition of a class. If you are using a pointer or reference to a
453class, you don't need the header file. If you are simply returning a class
454instance from a prototyped function or method, you don't need it. In fact, for
455most cases, you simply don't need the definition of a class... and not
456<tt>#include</tt>'ing speeds up compilation.</p>
457
458<p>It is easy to try to go too overboard on this recommendation, however. You
459<b>must</b> include all of the header files that you are using -- you can
460include them either directly
461or indirectly (through another header file). To make sure that you don't
462accidently forget to include a header file in your module header, make sure to
463include your module header <b>first</b> in the implementation file (as mentioned
464above). This way there won't be any hidden dependencies that you'll find out
465about later...</p>
466
467</div>
468
469<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
470<div class="doc_subsubsection">
471 <a name="hl_privateheaders">Keep "internal" Headers Private</a>
472</div>
473
474<div class="doc_text">
475
476<p>Many modules have a complex implementation that causes them to use more than
477one implementation (<tt>.cpp</tt>) file. It is often tempting to put the
478internal communication interface (helper classes, extra functions, etc) in the
479public module header file. Don't do this.</p>
480
481<p>If you really need to do something like this, put a private header file in
482the same directory as the source files, and include it locally. This ensures
483that your private interface remains private and undisturbed by outsiders.</p>
484
485<p>Note however, that it's okay to put extra implementation methods a public
486class itself... just make them private (or protected), and all is well.</p>
487
488</div>
489
490<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
491<div class="doc_subsubsection">
492 <a name="ll_iostream"><tt>#include &lt;iostream&gt;</tt> is forbidden</a>
493</div>
494
495<div class="doc_text">
496
497<p>The use of <tt>#include &lt;iostream&gt;</tt> in library files is
498hereby <b><em>forbidden</em></b>. The primary reason for doing this is to
499support clients using LLVM libraries as part of larger systems. In particular,
500we statically link LLVM into some dynamic libraries. Even if LLVM isn't used,
501the static c'tors are run whenever an application start up that uses the dynamic
502library. There are two problems with this:</p>
503
504<ol>
505 <li>The time to run the static c'tors impacts startup time of
Bill Wendling71f8cf12007-11-06 09:36:34 +0000506 applications&mdash;a critical time for GUI apps.</li>
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000507 <li>The static c'tors cause the app to pull many extra pages of memory off the
Bill Wendling71f8cf12007-11-06 09:36:34 +0000508 disk: both the code for the static c'tors in each <tt>.o</tt> file and the
509 small amount of data that gets touched. In addition, touched/dirty pages
510 put more pressure on the VM system on low-memory machines.</li>
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000511</ol>
512
Bill Wendling71f8cf12007-11-06 09:36:34 +0000513<div align="center">
Bill Wendling496e2b92007-09-22 10:03:25 +0000514<table>
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000515 <tbody>
516 <tr>
517 <th>Old Way</th>
518 <th>New Way</th>
519 </tr>
520 <tr>
521 <td align="left"><pre>#include &lt;iostream&gt;</pre></td>
522 <td align="left"><pre>#include "llvm/Support/Streams.h"</pre></td>
523 </tr>
524 <tr>
525 <td align="left"><pre>DEBUG(std::cerr &lt;&lt; ...);
526DEBUG(dump(std::cerr));</pre></td>
527 <td align="left"><pre>DOUT &lt;&lt; ...;
Bill Wendling71f8cf12007-11-06 09:36:34 +0000528DEBUG(dump(DOUT));</pre></td>
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000529 </tr>
530 <tr>
531 <td align="left"><pre>std::cerr &lt;&lt; "Hello world\n";</pre></td>
532 <td align="left"><pre>llvm::cerr &lt;&lt; "Hello world\n";</pre></td>
533 </tr>
534 <tr>
535 <td align="left"><pre>std::cout &lt;&lt; "Hello world\n";</pre></td>
536 <td align="left"><pre>llvm::cout &lt;&lt; "Hello world\n";</pre></td>
537 </tr>
538 <tr>
539 <td align="left"><pre>std::cin &gt;&gt; Var;</pre></td>
540 <td align="left"><pre>llvm::cin &gt;&gt; Var;</pre></td>
541 </tr>
542 <tr>
543 <td align="left"><pre>std::ostream</pre></td>
544 <td align="left"><pre>llvm::OStream</pre></td>
545 </tr>
546 <tr>
547 <td align="left"><pre>std::istream</pre></td>
548 <td align="left"><pre>llvm::IStream</pre></td>
549 </tr>
550 <tr>
551 <td align="left"><pre>std::stringstream</pre></td>
552 <td align="left"><pre>llvm::StringStream</pre></td>
553 </tr>
554 <tr>
Bill Wendling496e2b92007-09-22 10:03:25 +0000555 <td align="left"><pre>void print(std::ostream &amp;Out);
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000556// ...
557print(std::cerr);</pre></td>
Bill Wendling71f8cf12007-11-06 09:36:34 +0000558 <td align="left"><pre>void print(llvm::OStream Out);<sup>1</sup>
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000559// ...
560print(llvm::cerr);</pre>
561
Bill Wendling71f8cf12007-11-06 09:36:34 +0000562</td> </tbody> </table>
563</div>
564
Bill Wendling496e2b92007-09-22 10:03:25 +0000565<div class="doc_text">
Bill Wendling71f8cf12007-11-06 09:36:34 +0000566<p><sup>1</sup><tt>llvm::OStream</tt> is a light-weight class so it should never
567be passed by reference. This is important because in some configurations,
568<tt>DOUT</tt> is an rvalue.</p>
Bill Wendling496e2b92007-09-22 10:03:25 +0000569</div>
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000570
571</div>
572
573
574<!-- ======================================================================= -->
575<div class="doc_subsection">
576 <a name="micro">The Low Level Issues</a>
577</div>
578
579
580<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
581<div class="doc_subsubsection">
582 <a name="ll_assert">Assert Liberally</a>
583</div>
584
585<div class="doc_text">
586
587<p>Use the "<tt>assert</tt>" function to its fullest. Check all of your
588preconditions and assumptions, you never know when a bug (not neccesarily even
589yours) might be caught early by an assertion, which reduces debugging time
590dramatically. The "<tt>&lt;cassert&gt;</tt>" header file is probably already
591included by the header files you are using, so it doesn't cost anything to use
592it.</p>
593
594<p>To further assist with debugging, make sure to put some kind of error message
595in the assertion statement (which is printed if the assertion is tripped). This
596helps the poor debugging make sense of why an assertion is being made and
597enforced, and hopefully what to do about it. Here is one complete example:</p>
598
599<div class="doc_code">
600<pre>
601inline Value *getOperand(unsigned i) {
602 assert(i &lt; Operands.size() &amp;&amp; "getOperand() out of range!");
603 return Operands[i];
604}
605</pre>
606</div>
607
608<p>Here are some examples:</p>
609
610<div class="doc_code">
611<pre>
612assert(Ty-&gt;isPointerType() &amp;&amp; "Can't allocate a non pointer type!");
613
614assert((Opcode == Shl || Opcode == Shr) &amp;&amp; "ShiftInst Opcode invalid!");
615
616assert(idx &lt; getNumSuccessors() &amp;&amp; "Successor # out of range!");
617
618assert(V1.getType() == V2.getType() &amp;&amp; "Constant types must be identical!");
619
620assert(isa&lt;PHINode&gt;(Succ-&gt;front()) &amp;&amp; "Only works on PHId BBs!");
621</pre>
622</div>
623
624<p>You get the idea...</p>
625
Nick Lewycky009216a2008-05-31 23:54:55 +0000626<p>Please be aware when adding assert statements that not all compilers are aware of
627the semantics of the assert. In some places, asserts are used to indicate a piece of
628code that should not be reached. These are typically of the form:</p>
629
630<div class="doc_code">
631<pre>
632assert(0 && "Some helpful error message");
633</pre>
634</div>
635
636<p>When used in a function that returns a value, they should be followed with a return
637statement and a comment indicating that this line is never reached. This will prevent
638a compiler which is unable to deduce that the assert statement never returns from
639generating a warning.</p>
640
641<div class="doc_code">
642<pre>
643assert(0 && "Some helpful error message");
644// Not reached
645return 0;
646</pre>
647</div>
648
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000649</div>
650
651<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
652<div class="doc_subsubsection">
653 <a name="ll_ns_std">Do not use '<tt>using namespace std</tt>'</a>
654</div>
655
656<div class="doc_text">
657<p>In LLVM, we prefer to explicitly prefix all identifiers from the standard
658namespace with an "<tt>std::</tt>" prefix, rather than rely on
659"<tt>using namespace std;</tt>".</p>
660
661<p> In header files, adding a '<tt>using namespace XXX</tt>' directive pollutes
662the namespace of any source file that includes the header. This is clearly a
663bad thing.</p>
664
665<p>In implementation files (e.g. .cpp files), the rule is more of a stylistic
666rule, but is still important. Basically, using explicit namespace prefixes
667makes the code <b>clearer</b>, because it is immediately obvious what facilities
668are being used and where they are coming from, and <b>more portable</b>, because
669namespace clashes cannot occur between LLVM code and other namespaces. The
670portability rule is important because different standard library implementations
671expose different symbols (potentially ones they shouldn't), and future revisions
672to the C++ standard will add more symbols to the <tt>std</tt> namespace. As
673such, we never use '<tt>using namespace std;</tt>' in LLVM.</p>
674
675<p>The exception to the general rule (i.e. it's not an exception for
676the <tt>std</tt> namespace) is for implementation files. For example, all of
677the code in the LLVM project implements code that lives in the 'llvm' namespace.
678As such, it is ok, and actually clearer, for the .cpp files to have a '<tt>using
679namespace llvm</tt>' directive at their top, after the <tt>#include</tt>s. The
680general form of this rule is that any .cpp file that implements code in any
681namespace may use that namespace (and its parents'), but should not use any
682others.</p>
683
684</div>
685
686<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
687<div class="doc_subsubsection">
688 <a name="ll_virtual_anch">Provide a virtual method anchor for classes
689 in headers</a>
690</div>
691
692<div class="doc_text">
693
694<p>If a class is defined in a header file and has a v-table (either it has
695virtual methods or it derives from classes with virtual methods), it must
696always have at least one out-of-line virtual method in the class. Without
697this, the compiler will copy the vtable and RTTI into every .o file that
698#includes the header, bloating .o file sizes and increasing link times.
699</p>
700
701</div>
702
703
704<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
705<div class="doc_subsubsection">
706 <a name="ll_preincrement">Prefer Preincrement</a>
707</div>
708
709<div class="doc_text">
710
711<p>Hard fast rule: Preincrement (<tt>++X</tt>) may be no slower than
712postincrement (<tt>X++</tt>) and could very well be a lot faster than it. Use
713preincrementation whenever possible.</p>
714
715<p>The semantics of postincrement include making a copy of the value being
716incremented, returning it, and then preincrementing the "work value". For
717primitive types, this isn't a big deal... but for iterators, it can be a huge
718issue (for example, some iterators contains stack and set objects in them...
719copying an iterator could invoke the copy ctor's of these as well). In general,
720get in the habit of always using preincrement, and you won't have a problem.</p>
721
722</div>
723
724<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
725<div class="doc_subsubsection">
726 <a name="ll_avoidendl">Avoid <tt>std::endl</tt></a>
727</div>
728
729<div class="doc_text">
730
731<p>The <tt>std::endl</tt> modifier, when used with iostreams outputs a newline
732to the output stream specified. In addition to doing this, however, it also
733flushes the output stream. In other words, these are equivalent:</p>
734
735<div class="doc_code">
736<pre>
737std::cout &lt;&lt; std::endl;
738std::cout &lt;&lt; '\n' &lt;&lt; std::flush;
739</pre>
740</div>
741
742<p>Most of the time, you probably have no reason to flush the output stream, so
743it's better to use a literal <tt>'\n'</tt>.</p>
744
745</div>
746
747
748<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
749<div class="doc_section">
750 <a name="seealso">See Also</a>
751</div>
752<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
753
754<div class="doc_text">
755
756<p>A lot of these comments and recommendations have been culled for other
757sources. Two particularly important books for our work are:</p>
758
759<ol>
760
Chris Lattnerb5955b72007-11-09 21:49:08 +0000761<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Effective-Specific-Addison-Wesley-Professional-Computing/dp/0321334876">Effective
762C++</a> by Scott Meyers. Also
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000763interesting and useful are "More Effective C++" and "Effective STL" by the same
764author.</li>
765
Chris Lattnerb5955b72007-11-09 21:49:08 +0000766<li>Large-Scale C++ Software Design by John Lakos</li>
Dan Gohmanf17a25c2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000767
768</ol>
769
770<p>If you get some free time, and you haven't read them: do so, you might learn
771something.</p>
772
773</div>
774
775<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
776
777<hr>
778<address>
779 <a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer"><img
780 src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss" alt="Valid CSS!"></a>
781 <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
782 src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401" alt="Valid HTML 4.01!"></a>
783
784 <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a><br>
785 <a href="http://llvm.org">LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br>
786 Last modified: $Date$
787</address>
788
789</body>
790</html>