r600g: do RV6xx base updates inline with state updates.
This seems more in line with what the documentation suggests we should be
doing. It doesn't fix the rv635 regression, though I thought it might,
so it means I've no idea whats actually going wrong there.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
diff --git a/src/gallium/winsys/r600/drm/r600_priv.h b/src/gallium/winsys/r600/drm/r600_priv.h
index 27bdf2b..f8363f9 100644
--- a/src/gallium/winsys/r600/drm/r600_priv.h
+++ b/src/gallium/winsys/r600/drm/r600_priv.h
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
#define REG_FLAG_NEED_BO 1
#define REG_FLAG_DIRTY_ALWAYS 2
+#define REG_FLAG_RV6XX_SBU 4
struct r600_reg {
unsigned opcode;