rculist: use list_entry_rcu in places where it's appropriate
Use previously introduced list_entry_rcu instead of an open-coded
list_entry + rcu_dereference combination.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
LKML-Reference: <20090414181715.GA3634@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
index e03a7e1..11d2cb1 100644
--- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
+++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
@@ -734,8 +734,8 @@
return;
}
- m = list_entry(rcu_dereference(smk_netlbladdr_list.next),
- struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
+ m = list_entry_rcu(smk_netlbladdr_list.next,
+ struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
/* the comparison '>' is a bit hacky, but works */
if (new->smk_mask.s_addr > m->smk_mask.s_addr) {
@@ -748,8 +748,8 @@
list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);
return;
}
- m_next = list_entry(rcu_dereference(m->list.next),
- struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
+ m_next = list_entry_rcu(m->list.next,
+ struct smk_netlbladdr, list);
if (new->smk_mask.s_addr > m_next->smk_mask.s_addr) {
list_add_rcu(&new->list, &m->list);
return;