percpu_counter: Rename __percpu_counter_add to percpu_counter_add_batch
Currently, percpu_counter_add is a wrapper around __percpu_counter_add
which is preempt safe due to explicit calls to preempt_disable. Given
how __ prefix is used in percpu related interfaces, the naming
unfortunately creates the false sense that __percpu_counter_add is
less safe than percpu_counter_add. In terms of context-safety,
they're equivalent. The only difference is that the __ version takes
a batch parameter.
Make this a bit more explicit by just renaming __percpu_counter_add to
percpu_counter_add_batch.
This patch doesn't cause any functional changes.
tj: Minor updates to patch description for clarity. Cosmetic
indentation updates.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 061c1d1..eb5c955 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -1255,9 +1255,9 @@
btrfs_assert_tree_locked(buf);
if (test_and_clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &buf->bflags)) {
- __percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
- -buf->len,
- fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+ -buf->len,
+ fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
/* ugh, clear_extent_buffer_dirty needs to lock the page */
btrfs_set_lock_blocking(buf);
clear_extent_buffer_dirty(buf);
@@ -4046,9 +4046,9 @@
buf->start, transid, fs_info->generation);
was_dirty = set_extent_buffer_dirty(buf);
if (!was_dirty)
- __percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
- buf->len,
- fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
+ percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+ buf->len,
+ fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY
if (btrfs_header_level(buf) == 0 && check_leaf(root, buf)) {
btrfs_print_leaf(fs_info, buf);