commit | 16bfdaafa2c66d8cc81422a97a105a849ca65b3e | [log] [tgz] |
---|---|---|
author | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> | Mon Nov 07 17:23:30 2011 -0500 |
committer | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> | Tue Nov 08 11:28:45 2011 -0500 |
tree | 122c457da33077af885dbfea1d2c7745325f80ec | |
parent | 06f1f864d4ae5804e83785308d41f14a08e4b980 [diff] |
nfsd4: share open and lock owner hash tables Now that they're used in the same way, it's a little simpler to put open and lock owners in the same hash table, and I can't see a reason not to. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>