drm: don't de-authenticate clients on master-close

If an active DRM-Master closes its device, we deauthenticate all clients
on that master. However, if an inactive DRM-Master closes its device, we
do nothing. This is quite inconsistent and breaks several scenarios:

 1) If this was used as security mechanism, it fails horribly if a master
    closes a device while VT switched away. Furthermore, none of the few
    drivers using ->master_*() callbacks seems to require it, anyway.

 2) If you spawn weston (or any other non-UMS compositor) in background
    while another compositor is active, both will get assigned to the
    same "drm_master" object. If the foreground compositor now exits, all
    clients of both the foreground AND background compositor will be
    de-authenticated leading to unexpected behavior.

Stop this non-sense and keep clients authenticated. We don't do this when
dropping DRM-Master (i.e., switching VTs) so don't do it on active-close
either!

Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
index 53435e0..3299175 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
@@ -199,8 +199,7 @@
 	priv->minor = minor;
 
 	/* for compatibility root is always authenticated */
-	priv->always_authenticated = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
-	priv->authenticated = priv->always_authenticated;
+	priv->authenticated = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
 	priv->lock_count = 0;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->lhead);
@@ -462,20 +461,12 @@
 
 	if (drm_is_master(file_priv)) {
 		struct drm_master *master = file_priv->master;
-		struct drm_file *temp;
-
-		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-		list_for_each_entry(temp, &dev->filelist, lhead) {
-			if ((temp->master == file_priv->master) &&
-			    (temp != file_priv))
-				temp->authenticated = temp->always_authenticated;
-		}
 
 		/**
 		 * Since the master is disappearing, so is the
 		 * possibility to lock.
 		 */
-
+		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 		if (master->lock.hw_lock) {
 			if (dev->sigdata.lock == master->lock.hw_lock)
 				dev->sigdata.lock = NULL;