cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates
The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.
Both increase and decrease happen at steps.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index a48b724..992f7c2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@
* sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
* (default), then we try to decrease frequency
*
- * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
- * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
+ * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
+ * frequency
*/
static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{