Merge branch 'sfx-fixes'
Edward Cree says:
====================
sfc: couple of fixes
First patch addresses a construct that causes sparse to error out.
With that fixed, sparse makes some warnings on ef10.c, second patch
fixes one of them.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
index 92e1c6d..c60c2d4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
@@ -828,9 +828,7 @@
static int efx_ef10_link_piobufs(struct efx_nic *efx)
{
struct efx_ef10_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
- _MCDI_DECLARE_BUF(inbuf,
- max(MC_CMD_LINK_PIOBUF_IN_LEN,
- MC_CMD_UNLINK_PIOBUF_IN_LEN));
+ MCDI_DECLARE_BUF(inbuf, MC_CMD_LINK_PIOBUF_IN_LEN);
struct efx_channel *channel;
struct efx_tx_queue *tx_queue;
unsigned int offset, index;
@@ -839,8 +837,6 @@
BUILD_BUG_ON(MC_CMD_LINK_PIOBUF_OUT_LEN != 0);
BUILD_BUG_ON(MC_CMD_UNLINK_PIOBUF_OUT_LEN != 0);
- memset(inbuf, 0, sizeof(inbuf));
-
/* Link a buffer to each VI in the write-combining mapping */
for (index = 0; index < nic_data->n_piobufs; ++index) {
MCDI_SET_DWORD(inbuf, LINK_PIOBUF_IN_PIOBUF_HANDLE,
@@ -920,6 +916,10 @@
return 0;
fail:
+ /* inbuf was defined for MC_CMD_LINK_PIOBUF. We can use the same
+ * buffer for MC_CMD_UNLINK_PIOBUF because it's shorter.
+ */
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(MC_CMD_LINK_PIOBUF_IN_LEN < MC_CMD_UNLINK_PIOBUF_IN_LEN);
while (index--) {
MCDI_SET_DWORD(inbuf, UNLINK_PIOBUF_IN_TXQ_INSTANCE,
nic_data->pio_write_vi_base + index);
@@ -2183,7 +2183,7 @@
/* Modify IPv4 header if needed. */
ip->tot_len = 0;
ip->check = 0;
- ipv4_id = ip->id;
+ ipv4_id = ntohs(ip->id);
} else {
/* Modify IPv6 header if needed. */
struct ipv6hdr *ipv6 = ipv6_hdr(skb);