wireless: slight optimization of addr compare
Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal or
ether_addr_equal_unaligned instead of memcmp.
Cc: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c
index 38d2089..1477d7f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/wireless.h>
#include <linux/ieee80211.h>
+#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
#include <net/iw_handler.h>
@@ -673,8 +674,7 @@
matchflag = 1;
if (matchflag) {
for (i = 0; i < this->bss_cnt; i++) {
- if (!memcmp(this->bss_set[i].bssid,
- sig.bssid, ETH_ALEN)) {
+ if (ether_addr_equal_unaligned(this->bss_set[i].bssid, sig.bssid)) {
matchflag = 0;
break;
}