drm/via: clean up reclaim_buffers
A few things
- kill reclaim_buffers, it's never ever called because via does not set
DRIVER_HAVE_DMA
- inline the idlelock dance into the buffer reclaim logic and make it
a simple preclose cleanup function
- directly call the the dma_quiescent function and kill the needless
if check.
v2: Actually drop the idlelock when we take it. Reported by James
Simmons.
v3: Rebased onto latest drm-next.
v4: Fixup the refactor.
v5: More fixup the refactor - I've accidentally changed the check for
any master to checking whether the closing fd is the master.
v6: Don't forget to drop the idlelock in the early return path, too.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c
index a3574d0..acfcb35 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c
@@ -215,14 +215,20 @@
struct via_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
struct via_memblock *entry, *next;
+ if (!(file->minor->master && file->master->lock.hw_lock))
+ return;
+
+ drm_idlelock_take(&file->master->lock);
+
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
if (list_empty(&file_priv->obj_list)) {
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ drm_idlelock_release(&file->master->lock);
+
return;
}
- if (dev->driver->dma_quiescent)
- dev->driver->dma_quiescent(dev);
+ via_driver_dma_quiescent(dev);
list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, next, &file_priv->obj_list,
owner_list) {
@@ -231,5 +237,8 @@
kfree(entry);
}
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
+ drm_idlelock_release(&file->master->lock);
+
return;
}