docs: fix locations of several documents that got moved
The previous patch renamed several files that are cross-referenced
along the Kernel documentation. Adjust the links to point to
the right places.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
index 0fe1c6e..cdebc5c 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
+++ b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
@@ -136,14 +136,14 @@
Q: I see a network patch and I think it should be backported to stable.
Should I request it via "stable@vger.kernel.org" like the references in
- the kernel's Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt file say?
+ the kernel's Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file say?
A: No, not for networking. Check the stable queues as per above 1st to see
if it is already queued. If not, then send a mail to netdev, listing
the upstream commit ID and why you think it should be a stable candidate.
Before you jump to go do the above, do note that the normal stable rules
- in Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt still apply. So you need to
+ in Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst still apply. So you need to
explicitly indicate why it is a critical fix and exactly what users are
impacted. In addition, you need to convince yourself that you _really_
think it has been overlooked, vs. having been considered and rejected.
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
If you think there is some valid information relating to it being in
stable that does _not_ belong in the commit log, then use the three
- dash marker line as described in Documentation/SubmittingPatches to
+ dash marker line as described in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst to
temporarily embed that information into the patch that you send.
Q: Someone said that the comment style and coding convention is different
@@ -220,5 +220,5 @@
If it is your first patch, mail it to yourself so you can test apply
it to an unpatched tree to confirm infrastructure didn't mangle it.
- Finally, go back and read Documentation/SubmittingPatches to be
+ Finally, go back and read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst to be
sure you are not repeating some common mistake documented there.