don't expose I_NEW inodes via dentry->d_inode
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
is a bad idea; do it the other way round...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/fs/ext3/namei.c b/fs/ext3/namei.c
index 85286db..8f4fdda 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/namei.c
@@ -1671,8 +1671,8 @@
int err = ext3_add_entry(handle, dentry, inode);
if (!err) {
ext3_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
- d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
+ d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
return 0;
}
drop_nlink(inode);
@@ -1836,8 +1836,8 @@
if (err)
goto out_clear_inode;
- d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
+ d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
out_stop:
brelse(dir_block);
ext3_journal_stop(handle);