NFS: Fix the fix to Bugzilla #11061, when IPv6 isn't defined...
Stephen Rothwell reports:
Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/built-in.o: In function `.nfs_get_client':
client.c:(.text+0x115010): undefined reference to `.__ipv6_addr_type'
Fix by moving the IPV6 specific parts of commit
d7371c41b0cda782256b1df759df4e8d4724584c ("Bug 11061, NFS mounts dropped")
into the '#ifdef IPV6..." section.
Also fix up a couple of formatting issues.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c
index 06654b8..574158a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/client.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/client.c
@@ -255,6 +255,32 @@
}
return 0;
}
+
+/*
+ * Test if two ip6 socket addresses refer to the same socket by
+ * comparing relevant fields. The padding bytes specifically, are not
+ * compared. sin6_flowinfo is not compared because it only affects QoS
+ * and sin6_scope_id is only compared if the address is "link local"
+ * because "link local" addresses need only be unique to a specific
+ * link. Conversely, ordinary unicast addresses might have different
+ * sin6_scope_id.
+ *
+ * The caller should ensure both socket addresses are AF_INET6.
+ */
+static int nfs_sockaddr_cmp_ip6(const struct sockaddr *sa1,
+ const struct sockaddr *sa2)
+{
+ const struct sockaddr_in6 *saddr1 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)sa1;
+ const struct sockaddr_in6 *saddr2 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)sa2;
+
+ if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&saddr1->sin6_addr,
+ &saddr1->sin6_addr))
+ return 0;
+ if (ipv6_addr_scope(&saddr1->sin6_addr) == IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL &&
+ saddr1->sin6_scope_id != saddr2->sin6_scope_id)
+ return 0;
+ return saddr1->sin6_port == saddr2->sin6_port;
+}
#else
static int nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr4(const struct sockaddr_in *sa1,
const struct sockaddr_in *sa2)
@@ -270,6 +296,12 @@
return nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr4((const struct sockaddr_in *)sa1,
(const struct sockaddr_in *)sa2);
}
+
+static int nfs_sockaddr_cmp_ip6(const struct sockaddr * sa1,
+ const struct sockaddr * sa2)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif
/*
@@ -279,38 +311,18 @@
*
* The caller should ensure both socket addresses are AF_INET.
*/
-static int nfs_sockaddr_cmp_ip4(const struct sockaddr_in * saddr1,
- const struct sockaddr_in * saddr2)
+static int nfs_sockaddr_cmp_ip4(const struct sockaddr *sa1,
+ const struct sockaddr *sa2)
{
+ const struct sockaddr_in *saddr1 = (const struct sockaddr_in *)sa1;
+ const struct sockaddr_in *saddr2 = (const struct sockaddr_in *)sa2;
+
if (saddr1->sin_addr.s_addr != saddr2->sin_addr.s_addr)
return 0;
return saddr1->sin_port == saddr2->sin_port;
}
/*
- * Test if two ip6 socket addresses refer to the same socket by
- * comparing relevant fields. The padding bytes specifically, are not
- * compared. sin6_flowinfo is not compared because it only affects QoS
- * and sin6_scope_id is only compared if the address is "link local"
- * because "link local" addresses need only be unique to a specific
- * link. Conversely, ordinary unicast addresses might have different
- * sin6_scope_id.
- *
- * The caller should ensure both socket addresses are AF_INET6.
- */
-static int nfs_sockaddr_cmp_ip6 (const struct sockaddr_in6 * saddr1,
- const struct sockaddr_in6 * saddr2)
-{
- if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&saddr1->sin6_addr,
- &saddr1->sin6_addr))
- return 0;
- if (ipv6_addr_scope(&saddr1->sin6_addr) == IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL &&
- saddr1->sin6_scope_id != saddr2->sin6_scope_id)
- return 0;
- return saddr1->sin6_port == saddr2->sin6_port;
-}
-
-/*
* Test if two socket addresses represent the same actual socket,
* by comparing (only) relevant fields.
*/
@@ -322,11 +334,9 @@
switch (sa1->sa_family) {
case AF_INET:
- return nfs_sockaddr_cmp_ip4((const struct sockaddr_in *) sa1,
- (const struct sockaddr_in *) sa2);
+ return nfs_sockaddr_cmp_ip4(sa1, sa2);
case AF_INET6:
- return nfs_sockaddr_cmp_ip6((const struct sockaddr_in6 *) sa1,
- (const struct sockaddr_in6 *) sa2);
+ return nfs_sockaddr_cmp_ip6(sa1, sa2);
}
return 0;
}