tipc: correct usage of spin_lock() vs spin_lock_bh()
I commit e099e86c9e24fe9aff36773600543eb31d8954d
("tipc: add node_lock protection to link lookup function")
we are calling spin_lock(&node->lock) directly instead of indirectly
via the tipc_node_lock(node) function. However, tipc_node_lock() is
using spin_lock_bh(), not spin_lock(), something leading to
unbalanced usage in one place, and a smatch warning.
We fix this by consistently using tipc_node_lock()/unlock() in
in the places touched by the mentioned commit.
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
1 file changed