clocksource/drivers/efm32: Use CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC for defining features
We have used CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC instead of
CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC while defining features. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-Koenig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk
Cc: digetx@gmail.com
Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com
Cc: laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427746633-9137-11-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c b/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c
index ec57ba2..5b6e3d5 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
static struct efm32_clock_event_ddata clock_event_ddata = {
.evtdev = {
.name = "efm32 clockevent",
- .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC,
+ .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC,
.set_mode = efm32_clock_event_set_mode,
.set_next_event = efm32_clock_event_set_next_event,
.rating = 200,