ocfs2: fix issue that ocfs2_setattr() does not deal with new_i_size==i_size
The issue scenario is as following:
- Create a small file and fallocate a large disk space for a file with
FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE option.
- ftruncate the file back to the original size again. but the disk free
space is not changed back. This is a real bug that be fixed in this
patch.
In order to solve the issue above, we modified ocfs2_setattr(), if
attr->ia_size != i_size_read(inode), It calls ocfs2_truncate_file(), and
truncate disk space to attr->ia_size.
Signed-off-by: Younger Liu <younger.liu@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jensen <shencanquan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
index fcd9706..9148353 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
@@ -477,11 +477,6 @@
goto bail;
}
- /* lets handle the simple truncate cases before doing any more
- * cluster locking. */
- if (new_i_size == le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size))
- goto bail;
-
down_write(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_alloc_sem);
ocfs2_resv_discard(&osb->osb_la_resmap,
@@ -1148,14 +1143,14 @@
goto bail_unlock_rw;
}
- if (size_change && attr->ia_size != i_size_read(inode)) {
+ if (size_change) {
status = inode_newsize_ok(inode, attr->ia_size);
if (status)
goto bail_unlock;
inode_dio_wait(inode);
- if (i_size_read(inode) > attr->ia_size) {
+ if (i_size_read(inode) >= attr->ia_size) {
if (ocfs2_should_order_data(inode)) {
status = ocfs2_begin_ordered_truncate(inode,
attr->ia_size);