[IPV4/IPV6]: Replace spin_lock_irq with spin_lock_bh
In light of my recent patch to net/ipv4/udp.c that replaced the
spin_lock_irq calls on the receive queue lock with spin_lock_bh,
here is a similar patch for all other occurences of spin_lock_irq
on receive/error queue locks in IPv4 and IPv6.
In these stacks, we know that they can only be entered from user
or softirq context. Therefore it's safe to disable BH only.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
index 47012b9..f8b172f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
@@ -360,14 +360,14 @@
err = copied;
/* Reset and regenerate socket error */
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
sk->sk_err = 0;
if ((skb2 = skb_peek(&sk->sk_error_queue)) != NULL) {
sk->sk_err = SKB_EXT_ERR(skb2)->ee.ee_errno;
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
sk->sk_error_report(sk);
} else
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
out_free_skb:
kfree_skb(skb);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/raw.c b/net/ipv4/raw.c
index 5b1ec58..8c15120 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/raw.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/raw.c
@@ -691,11 +691,11 @@
struct sk_buff *skb;
int amount = 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
if (skb != NULL)
amount = skb->len;
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
return put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg);
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/datagram.c b/net/ipv6/datagram.c
index 65b9375..5229365 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/datagram.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/datagram.c
@@ -353,14 +353,14 @@
err = copied;
/* Reset and regenerate socket error */
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
sk->sk_err = 0;
if ((skb2 = skb_peek(&sk->sk_error_queue)) != NULL) {
sk->sk_err = SKB_EXT_ERR(skb2)->ee.ee_errno;
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
sk->sk_error_report(sk);
} else {
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
}
out_free_skb:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/raw.c b/net/ipv6/raw.c
index 617645b..e2b848e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/raw.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/raw.c
@@ -434,12 +434,12 @@
/* Clear queue. */
if (flags&MSG_PEEK) {
int clear = 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
if (skb == skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) {
__skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
clear = 1;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
if (clear)
kfree_skb(skb);
}
@@ -971,11 +971,11 @@
struct sk_buff *skb;
int amount = 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
if (skb != NULL)
amount = skb->tail - skb->h.raw;
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
return put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg);
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
index e251d0b..eff050a 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
@@ -300,12 +300,12 @@
/* Clear queue. */
if (flags&MSG_PEEK) {
int clear = 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
if (skb == skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) {
__skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
clear = 1;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
if (clear)
kfree_skb(skb);
}