usb: musb: make modules behave better
There's really no point in doing all that
initcall trickery when we can safely let
udev handle module probing for us.
Remove all of that trickery, by moving everybody
to module_init() and making proper use of
platform_device_register() rather than
platform_device_probe().
Tested-by: Rajashekhara, Sudhakar <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
Tested-by: Tasslehoff Kjappfot <tasskjapp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.c b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.c
index 1f40561..b387f12 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010.c
@@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@
static u64 tusb_dmamask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
-static int __init tusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int __devinit tusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct musb_hdrc_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
struct platform_device *musb;
@@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@
return ret;
}
-static int __exit tusb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int __devexit tusb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct tusb6010_glue *glue = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -1239,7 +1239,8 @@
}
static struct platform_driver tusb_driver = {
- .remove = __exit_p(tusb_remove),
+ .probe = tusb_probe,
+ .remove = __devexit_p(tusb_remove),
.driver = {
.name = "musb-tusb",
},
@@ -1251,9 +1252,9 @@
static int __init tusb_init(void)
{
- return platform_driver_probe(&tusb_driver, tusb_probe);
+ return platform_driver_register(&tusb_driver);
}
-subsys_initcall(tusb_init);
+module_init(tusb_init);
static void __exit tusb_exit(void)
{