Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | CONFIG_RCU_TRACE debugfs Files and Formats |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 4 | The rcutree implementation of RCU provides debugfs trace output that |
| 5 | summarizes counters and state. This information is useful for debugging |
| 6 | RCU itself, and can sometimes also help to debug abuses of RCU. |
| 7 | The following sections describe the debugfs files and formats. |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Hierarchical RCU debugfs Files and Formats |
| 11 | |
| 12 | This implementation of RCU provides three debugfs files under the |
| 13 | top-level directory RCU: rcu/rcudata (which displays fields in struct |
| 14 | rcu_data), rcu/rcugp (which displays grace-period counters), and |
| 15 | rcu/rcuhier (which displays the struct rcu_node hierarchy). |
| 16 | |
| 17 | The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" looks as follows: |
| 18 | |
Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 19 | rcu_sched: |
Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 20 | 0 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=10951/1 dn=0 df=1101 of=0 ri=36 ql=0 b=10 |
| 21 | 1 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=16117/1 dn=0 df=1015 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 22 | 2 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=1445/1 dn=0 df=1839 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 23 | 3 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=6681/1 dn=0 df=1545 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 24 | 4 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=1003/1 dn=0 df=1992 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 25 | 5 c=17829 g=17830 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=1 dt=3887/1 dn=0 df=3331 of=0 ri=4 ql=2 b=10 |
| 26 | 6 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=859/1 dn=0 df=3224 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 27 | 7 c=17829 g=17830 pq=0 pqc=17829 qp=1 dt=3761/1 dn=0 df=1818 of=0 ri=0 ql=2 b=10 |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 28 | rcu_bh: |
Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 29 | 0 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=10951/1 dn=0 df=0 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 30 | 1 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=16117/1 dn=0 df=13 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 31 | 2 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=1445/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 32 | 3 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=6681/1 dn=0 df=9 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 33 | 4 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=1003/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 34 | 5 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=3887/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 35 | 6 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=859/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
| 36 | 7 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=3761/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 37 | |
Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 38 | The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu_sched, the second |
| 39 | for rcu_bh. Note that CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will have an |
| 40 | additional section for rcu_preempt. Each section has one line per CPU, |
| 41 | or eight for this 8-CPU system. The fields are as follows: |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 42 | |
| 43 | o The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number. |
| 44 | CPUs numbers followed by an exclamation mark are offline, |
| 45 | but have been online at least once since boot. There will be |
| 46 | no output for CPUs that have never been online, which can be |
| 47 | a good thing in the surprisingly common case where NR_CPUS is |
| 48 | substantially larger than the number of actual CPUs. |
| 49 | |
| 50 | o "c" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have |
| 51 | completed. CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag quite a ways |
Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 52 | behind, for example, CPU 4 under "rcu_sched" above, which has |
| 53 | slept through the past 25 RCU grace periods. It is not unusual |
| 54 | to see CPUs lagging by thousands of grace periods. |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 55 | |
| 56 | o "g" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have |
| 57 | started. Again, CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag behind. |
| 58 | If the "c" and "g" values are equal, this CPU has already |
| 59 | reported a quiescent state for the last RCU grace period that |
| 60 | it is aware of, otherwise, the CPU believes that it owes RCU a |
| 61 | quiescent state. |
| 62 | |
| 63 | o "pq" indicates that this CPU has passed through a quiescent state |
| 64 | for the current grace period. It is possible for "pq" to be |
| 65 | "1" and "c" different than "g", which indicates that although |
| 66 | the CPU has passed through a quiescent state, either (1) this |
| 67 | CPU has not yet reported that fact, (2) some other CPU has not |
| 68 | yet reported for this grace period, or (3) both. |
| 69 | |
| 70 | o "pqc" indicates which grace period the last-observed quiescent |
| 71 | state for this CPU corresponds to. This is important for handling |
| 72 | the race between CPU 0 reporting an extended dynticks-idle |
| 73 | quiescent state for CPU 1 and CPU 1 suddenly waking up and |
| 74 | reporting its own quiescent state. If CPU 1 was the last CPU |
| 75 | for the current grace period, then the CPU that loses this race |
| 76 | will attempt to incorrectly mark CPU 1 as having checked in for |
| 77 | the next grace period! |
| 78 | |
| 79 | o "qp" indicates that RCU still expects a quiescent state from |
| 80 | this CPU. |
| 81 | |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 82 | o "dt" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented |
| 83 | when entering or leaving dynticks idle state, either by the |
| 84 | scheduler or by irq. The number after the "/" is the interrupt |
| 85 | nesting depth when in dyntick-idle state, or one greater than |
| 86 | the interrupt-nesting depth otherwise. |
| 87 | |
| 88 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. |
| 89 | |
| 90 | o "dn" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented |
| 91 | when entering or leaving dynticks idle state via NMI. If both |
| 92 | the "dt" and "dn" values are even, then this CPU is in dynticks |
| 93 | idle mode and may be ignored by RCU. If either of these two |
| 94 | counters is odd, then RCU must be alert to the possibility of |
| 95 | an RCU read-side critical section running on this CPU. |
| 96 | |
| 97 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. |
| 98 | |
| 99 | o "df" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a |
| 100 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being in |
| 101 | dynticks-idle state. |
| 102 | |
| 103 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. |
| 104 | |
| 105 | o "of" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a |
| 106 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being |
| 107 | offline. In a perfect world, this might neve happen, but it |
| 108 | turns out that offlining and onlining a CPU can take several grace |
| 109 | periods, and so there is likely to be an extended period of time |
| 110 | when RCU believes that the CPU is online when it really is not. |
| 111 | Please note that erring in the other direction (RCU believing a |
| 112 | CPU is offline when it is really alive and kicking) is a fatal |
| 113 | error, so it makes sense to err conservatively. |
| 114 | |
| 115 | o "ri" is the number of times that RCU has seen fit to send a |
| 116 | reschedule IPI to this CPU in order to get it to report a |
| 117 | quiescent state. |
| 118 | |
| 119 | o "ql" is the number of RCU callbacks currently residing on |
| 120 | this CPU. This is the total number of callbacks, regardless |
| 121 | of what state they are in (new, waiting for grace period to |
| 122 | start, waiting for grace period to end, ready to invoke). |
| 123 | |
| 124 | o "b" is the batch limit for this CPU. If more than this number |
| 125 | of RCU callbacks is ready to invoke, then the remainder will |
| 126 | be deferred. |
| 127 | |
Paul E. McKenney | 269dcc1 | 2010-09-07 14:23:09 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 128 | o "ci" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been invoked for |
| 129 | this CPU. Note that ci+ql is the number of callbacks that have |
| 130 | been registered in absence of CPU-hotplug activity. |
| 131 | |
| 132 | o "co" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been orphaned due to |
| 133 | this CPU going offline. |
| 134 | |
| 135 | o "ca" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been adopted due to |
| 136 | other CPUs going offline. Note that ci+co-ca+ql is the number of |
| 137 | RCU callbacks registered on this CPU. |
| 138 | |
Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 139 | There is also an rcu/rcudata.csv file with the same information in |
| 140 | comma-separated-variable spreadsheet format. |
| 141 | |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 142 | |
| 143 | The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows: |
| 144 | |
Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 145 | rcu_sched: completed=33062 gpnum=33063 |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 146 | rcu_bh: completed=464 gpnum=464 |
| 147 | |
Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 148 | Again, this output is for both "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh". Note that |
| 149 | kernels built with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU will have an additional |
| 150 | "rcu_preempt" line. The fields are taken from the rcu_state structure, |
| 151 | and are as follows: |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 152 | |
| 153 | o "completed" is the number of grace periods that have completed. |
| 154 | It is comparable to the "c" field from rcu/rcudata in that a |
| 155 | CPU whose "c" field matches the value of "completed" is aware |
| 156 | that the corresponding RCU grace period has completed. |
| 157 | |
| 158 | o "gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started. It is |
| 159 | comparable to the "g" field from rcu/rcudata in that a CPU |
| 160 | whose "g" field matches the value of "gpnum" is aware that the |
| 161 | corresponding RCU grace period has started. |
| 162 | |
| 163 | If these two fields are equal (as they are for "rcu_bh" above), |
| 164 | then there is no grace period in progress, in other words, RCU |
| 165 | is idle. On the other hand, if the two fields differ (as they |
Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 166 | do for "rcu_sched" above), then an RCU grace period is in progress. |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 169 | The output of "cat rcu/rcuhier" looks as follows, with very long lines: |
| 170 | |
Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 171 | c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6 oqlen=0 |
Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 172 | 1/1 .>. 0:127 ^0 |
| 173 | 3/3 .>. 0:35 ^0 0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1 0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2 0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3 |
| 174 | 3/3f .>. 0:5 ^0 2/3 .>. 6:11 ^1 0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2 0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3 0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4 0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5 0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0 0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1 0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2 0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3 0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4 0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5 0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0 0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1 0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2 0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3 0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4 0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5 0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0 0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1 0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2 0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3 |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 175 | rcu_bh: |
Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 176 | c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0 oqlen=0 |
Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 177 | 0/1 .>. 0:127 ^0 |
| 178 | 0/3 .>. 0:35 ^0 0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1 0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2 0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3 |
| 179 | 0/3f .>. 0:5 ^0 0/3 .>. 6:11 ^1 0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2 0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3 0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4 0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5 0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0 0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1 0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2 0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3 0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4 0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5 0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0 0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1 0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2 0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3 0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4 0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5 0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0 0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1 0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2 0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3 |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 180 | |
Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 181 | This is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" portions, |
| 182 | and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will again have an additional |
| 183 | "rcu_preempt" section. The fields are as follows: |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 184 | |
| 185 | o "c" is exactly the same as "completed" under rcu/rcugp. |
| 186 | |
| 187 | o "g" is exactly the same as "gpnum" under rcu/rcugp. |
| 188 | |
| 189 | o "s" is the "signaled" state that drives force_quiescent_state()'s |
| 190 | state machine. |
| 191 | |
| 192 | o "jfq" is the number of jiffies remaining for this grace period |
| 193 | before force_quiescent_state() is invoked to help push things |
Paul E. McKenney | 269dcc1 | 2010-09-07 14:23:09 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 194 | along. Note that CPUs in dyntick-idle mode throughout the grace |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 195 | period will not report on their own, but rather must be check by |
| 196 | some other CPU via force_quiescent_state(). |
| 197 | |
| 198 | o "j" is the low-order four hex digits of the jiffies counter. |
| 199 | Yes, Paul did run into a number of problems that turned out to |
| 200 | be due to the jiffies counter no longer counting. Why do you ask? |
| 201 | |
| 202 | o "nfqs" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() since |
| 203 | boot. |
| 204 | |
| 205 | o "nfqsng" is the number of useless calls to force_quiescent_state(), |
| 206 | where there wasn't actually a grace period active. This can |
| 207 | happen due to races. The number in parentheses is the difference |
| 208 | between "nfqs" and "nfqsng", or the number of times that |
| 209 | force_quiescent_state() actually did some real work. |
| 210 | |
| 211 | o "fqlh" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() that |
| 212 | exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above) |
| 213 | due to contention on ->fqslock. |
| 214 | |
Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 215 | o "oqlen" is the number of callbacks on the "orphan" callback |
| 216 | list. RCU callbacks are placed on this list by CPUs going |
| 217 | offline, and are "adopted" either by the CPU helping the outgoing |
| 218 | CPU or by the next rcu_barrier*() call, whichever comes first. |
| 219 | |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 220 | o Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct |
| 221 | rcu_node. Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, from |
| 222 | root to leaves. It is best to think of the rcu_data structures |
| 223 | as forming yet another level after the leaves. Note that there |
| 224 | might be either one, two, or three levels of rcu_node structures, |
| 225 | depending on the relationship between CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT and |
| 226 | CONFIG_NR_CPUS. |
Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 227 | |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 228 | o The numbers separated by the "/" are the qsmask followed |
| 229 | by the qsmaskinit. The qsmask will have one bit |
| 230 | set for each entity in the next lower level that |
| 231 | has not yet checked in for the current grace period. |
| 232 | The qsmaskinit will have one bit for each entity that is |
| 233 | currently expected to check in during each grace period. |
| 234 | The value of qsmaskinit is assigned to that of qsmask |
| 235 | at the beginning of each grace period. |
| 236 | |
Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 237 | For example, for "rcu_sched", the qsmask of the first |
| 238 | entry of the lowest level is 0x14, meaning that we |
| 239 | are still waiting for CPUs 2 and 4 to check in for the |
| 240 | current grace period. |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 241 | |
Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 242 | o The characters separated by the ">" indicate the state |
| 243 | of the blocked-tasks lists. A "T" preceding the ">" |
| 244 | indicates that at least one task blocked in an RCU |
| 245 | read-side critical section blocks the current grace |
| 246 | period, while a "." preceding the ">" indicates otherwise. |
| 247 | The character following the ">" indicates similarly for |
| 248 | the next grace period. A "T" should appear in this |
| 249 | field only for rcu-preempt. |
| 250 | |
Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 251 | o The numbers separated by the ":" are the range of CPUs |
| 252 | served by this struct rcu_node. This can be helpful |
| 253 | in working out how the hierarchy is wired together. |
| 254 | |
| 255 | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows |
| 256 | "0:5", indicating that it covers CPUs 0 through 5. |
| 257 | |
| 258 | o The number after the "^" indicates the bit in the |
| 259 | next higher level rcu_node structure that this |
| 260 | rcu_node structure corresponds to. |
| 261 | |
| 262 | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows |
| 263 | "^0", indicating that it corresponds to bit zero in |
| 264 | the first entry at the middle level. |
Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 265 | |
| 266 | |
| 267 | The output of "cat rcu/rcu_pending" looks as follows: |
| 268 | |
Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 269 | rcu_sched: |
Paul E. McKenney | d21670a | 2010-04-14 17:39:26 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 270 | 0 np=255892 qsp=53936 rpq=85 cbr=0 cng=14417 gpc=10033 gps=24320 nf=6445 nn=146741 |
| 271 | 1 np=261224 qsp=54638 rpq=33 cbr=0 cng=25723 gpc=16310 gps=2849 nf=5912 nn=155792 |
| 272 | 2 np=237496 qsp=49664 rpq=23 cbr=0 cng=2762 gpc=45478 gps=1762 nf=1201 nn=136629 |
| 273 | 3 np=236249 qsp=48766 rpq=98 cbr=0 cng=286 gpc=48049 gps=1218 nf=207 nn=137723 |
| 274 | 4 np=221310 qsp=46850 rpq=7 cbr=0 cng=26 gpc=43161 gps=4634 nf=3529 nn=123110 |
| 275 | 5 np=237332 qsp=48449 rpq=9 cbr=0 cng=54 gpc=47920 gps=3252 nf=201 nn=137456 |
| 276 | 6 np=219995 qsp=46718 rpq=12 cbr=0 cng=50 gpc=42098 gps=6093 nf=4202 nn=120834 |
| 277 | 7 np=249893 qsp=49390 rpq=42 cbr=0 cng=72 gpc=38400 gps=17102 nf=41 nn=144888 |
Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 278 | rcu_bh: |
Paul E. McKenney | d21670a | 2010-04-14 17:39:26 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 279 | 0 np=146741 qsp=1419 rpq=6 cbr=0 cng=6 gpc=0 gps=0 nf=2 nn=145314 |
| 280 | 1 np=155792 qsp=12597 rpq=3 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=8 nf=3 nn=143180 |
| 281 | 2 np=136629 qsp=18680 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=7 gps=6 nf=0 nn=117936 |
| 282 | 3 np=137723 qsp=2843 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=10 gps=7 nf=0 nn=134863 |
| 283 | 4 np=123110 qsp=12433 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=2 nf=0 nn=110671 |
| 284 | 5 np=137456 qsp=4210 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=5 nf=0 nn=133235 |
| 285 | 6 np=120834 qsp=9902 rpq=2 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nf=2 nn=110921 |
| 286 | 7 np=144888 qsp=26336 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nf=0 nn=118542 |
Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 287 | |
Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 288 | As always, this is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" |
| 289 | portions, with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels having an additional |
| 290 | "rcu_preempt" section. The fields are as follows: |
Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 291 | |
| 292 | o "np" is the number of times that __rcu_pending() has been invoked |
| 293 | for the corresponding flavor of RCU. |
| 294 | |
| 295 | o "qsp" is the number of times that the RCU was waiting for a |
| 296 | quiescent state from this CPU. |
| 297 | |
Paul E. McKenney | d21670a | 2010-04-14 17:39:26 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 298 | o "rpq" is the number of times that the CPU had passed through |
| 299 | a quiescent state, but not yet reported it to RCU. |
| 300 | |
Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 301 | o "cbr" is the number of times that this CPU had RCU callbacks |
| 302 | that had passed through a grace period, and were thus ready |
| 303 | to be invoked. |
| 304 | |
| 305 | o "cng" is the number of times that this CPU needed another |
| 306 | grace period while RCU was idle. |
| 307 | |
| 308 | o "gpc" is the number of times that an old grace period had |
| 309 | completed, but this CPU was not yet aware of it. |
| 310 | |
| 311 | o "gps" is the number of times that a new grace period had started, |
| 312 | but this CPU was not yet aware of it. |
| 313 | |
| 314 | o "nf" is the number of times that this CPU suspected that the |
| 315 | current grace period had run for too long, and thus needed to |
| 316 | be forced. |
| 317 | |
| 318 | Please note that "forcing" consists of sending resched IPIs |
| 319 | to holdout CPUs. If that CPU really still is in an old RCU |
| 320 | read-side critical section, then we really do have to wait for it. |
| 321 | The assumption behing "forcing" is that the CPU is not still in |
| 322 | an old RCU read-side critical section, but has not yet responded |
| 323 | for some other reason. |
| 324 | |
| 325 | o "nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing. Alert |
| 326 | readers will note that the rcu "nn" number for a given CPU very |
| 327 | closely matches the rcu_bh "np" number for that same CPU. This |
| 328 | is due to short-circuit evaluation in rcu_pending(). |