Huang Ying | f49f23a | 2011-07-13 13:14:23 +0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | #ifndef LLIST_H |
| 2 | #define LLIST_H |
| 3 | /* |
| 4 | * Lock-less NULL terminated single linked list |
| 5 | * |
| 6 | * If there are multiple producers and multiple consumers, llist_add |
| 7 | * can be used in producers and llist_del_all can be used in |
| 8 | * consumers. They can work simultaneously without lock. But |
| 9 | * llist_del_first can not be used here. Because llist_del_first |
| 10 | * depends on list->first->next does not changed if list->first is not |
| 11 | * changed during its operation, but llist_del_first, llist_add, |
| 12 | * llist_add (or llist_del_all, llist_add, llist_add) sequence in |
| 13 | * another consumer may violate that. |
| 14 | * |
| 15 | * If there are multiple producers and one consumer, llist_add can be |
| 16 | * used in producers and llist_del_all or llist_del_first can be used |
| 17 | * in the consumer. |
| 18 | * |
| 19 | * This can be summarized as follow: |
| 20 | * |
| 21 | * | add | del_first | del_all |
| 22 | * add | - | - | - |
| 23 | * del_first | | L | L |
| 24 | * del_all | | | - |
| 25 | * |
| 26 | * Where "-" stands for no lock is needed, while "L" stands for lock |
| 27 | * is needed. |
| 28 | * |
| 29 | * The list entries deleted via llist_del_all can be traversed with |
| 30 | * traversing function such as llist_for_each etc. But the list |
| 31 | * entries can not be traversed safely before deleted from the list. |
| 32 | * The order of deleted entries is from the newest to the oldest added |
| 33 | * one. If you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you |
| 34 | * must reverse the order by yourself before traversing. |
| 35 | * |
| 36 | * The basic atomic operation of this list is cmpxchg on long. On |
| 37 | * architectures that don't have NMI-safe cmpxchg implementation, the |
| 38 | * list can NOT be used in NMI handler. So code uses the list in NMI |
| 39 | * handler should depend on CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG. |
| 40 | */ |
| 41 | |
| 42 | struct llist_head { |
| 43 | struct llist_node *first; |
| 44 | }; |
| 45 | |
| 46 | struct llist_node { |
| 47 | struct llist_node *next; |
| 48 | }; |
| 49 | |
| 50 | #define LLIST_HEAD_INIT(name) { NULL } |
| 51 | #define LLIST_HEAD(name) struct llist_head name = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(name) |
| 52 | |
| 53 | /** |
| 54 | * init_llist_head - initialize lock-less list head |
| 55 | * @head: the head for your lock-less list |
| 56 | */ |
| 57 | static inline void init_llist_head(struct llist_head *list) |
| 58 | { |
| 59 | list->first = NULL; |
| 60 | } |
| 61 | |
| 62 | /** |
| 63 | * llist_entry - get the struct of this entry |
| 64 | * @ptr: the &struct llist_node pointer. |
| 65 | * @type: the type of the struct this is embedded in. |
| 66 | * @member: the name of the llist_node within the struct. |
| 67 | */ |
| 68 | #define llist_entry(ptr, type, member) \ |
| 69 | container_of(ptr, type, member) |
| 70 | |
| 71 | /** |
| 72 | * llist_for_each - iterate over some deleted entries of a lock-less list |
| 73 | * @pos: the &struct llist_node to use as a loop cursor |
| 74 | * @node: the first entry of deleted list entries |
| 75 | * |
| 76 | * In general, some entries of the lock-less list can be traversed |
| 77 | * safely only after being deleted from list, so start with an entry |
| 78 | * instead of list head. |
| 79 | * |
| 80 | * If being used on entries deleted from lock-less list directly, the |
| 81 | * traverse order is from the newest to the oldest added entry. If |
| 82 | * you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you must |
| 83 | * reverse the order by yourself before traversing. |
| 84 | */ |
| 85 | #define llist_for_each(pos, node) \ |
| 86 | for ((pos) = (node); pos; (pos) = (pos)->next) |
| 87 | |
| 88 | /** |
| 89 | * llist_for_each_entry - iterate over some deleted entries of lock-less list of given type |
| 90 | * @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor. |
| 91 | * @node: the fist entry of deleted list entries. |
| 92 | * @member: the name of the llist_node with the struct. |
| 93 | * |
| 94 | * In general, some entries of the lock-less list can be traversed |
| 95 | * safely only after being removed from list, so start with an entry |
| 96 | * instead of list head. |
| 97 | * |
| 98 | * If being used on entries deleted from lock-less list directly, the |
| 99 | * traverse order is from the newest to the oldest added entry. If |
| 100 | * you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you must |
| 101 | * reverse the order by yourself before traversing. |
| 102 | */ |
| 103 | #define llist_for_each_entry(pos, node, member) \ |
| 104 | for ((pos) = llist_entry((node), typeof(*(pos)), member); \ |
| 105 | &(pos)->member != NULL; \ |
| 106 | (pos) = llist_entry((pos)->member.next, typeof(*(pos)), member)) |
| 107 | |
| 108 | /** |
| 109 | * llist_empty - tests whether a lock-less list is empty |
| 110 | * @head: the list to test |
| 111 | * |
| 112 | * Not guaranteed to be accurate or up to date. Just a quick way to |
| 113 | * test whether the list is empty without deleting something from the |
| 114 | * list. |
| 115 | */ |
| 116 | static inline int llist_empty(const struct llist_head *head) |
| 117 | { |
| 118 | return ACCESS_ONCE(head->first) == NULL; |
| 119 | } |
| 120 | |
| 121 | void llist_add(struct llist_node *new, struct llist_head *head); |
| 122 | void llist_add_batch(struct llist_node *new_first, struct llist_node *new_last, |
| 123 | struct llist_head *head); |
| 124 | struct llist_node *llist_del_first(struct llist_head *head); |
| 125 | struct llist_node *llist_del_all(struct llist_head *head); |
| 126 | #endif /* LLIST_H */ |