blob: 77fb03acdbb4c025c4c87b118dbeda21010ca500 [file] [log] [blame]
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -03001==========================
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02002Remote Processor Framework
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -03003==========================
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -03005Introduction
6============
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02007
8Modern SoCs typically have heterogeneous remote processor devices in asymmetric
9multiprocessing (AMP) configurations, which may be running different instances
10of operating system, whether it's Linux or any other flavor of real-time OS.
11
12OMAP4, for example, has dual Cortex-A9, dual Cortex-M3 and a C64x+ DSP.
13In a typical configuration, the dual cortex-A9 is running Linux in a SMP
14configuration, and each of the other three cores (two M3 cores and a DSP)
15is running its own instance of RTOS in an AMP configuration.
16
17The remoteproc framework allows different platforms/architectures to
18control (power on, load firmware, power off) those remote processors while
19abstracting the hardware differences, so the entire driver doesn't need to be
20duplicated. In addition, this framework also adds rpmsg virtio devices
21for remote processors that supports this kind of communication. This way,
22platform-specific remoteproc drivers only need to provide a few low-level
23handlers, and then all rpmsg drivers will then just work
24(for more information about the virtio-based rpmsg bus and its drivers,
25please read Documentation/rpmsg.txt).
Ohad Ben-Cohen7a186942012-02-13 22:30:39 +010026Registration of other types of virtio devices is now also possible. Firmwares
27just need to publish what kind of virtio devices do they support, and then
28remoteproc will add those devices. This makes it possible to reuse the
29existing virtio drivers with remote processor backends at a minimal development
30cost.
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +020031
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -030032User API
33========
34
35::
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +020036
37 int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -030038
39Boot a remote processor (i.e. load its firmware, power it on, ...).
40
41If the remote processor is already powered on, this function immediately
42returns (successfully).
43
44Returns 0 on success, and an appropriate error value otherwise.
45Note: to use this function you should already have a valid rproc
46handle. There are several ways to achieve that cleanly (devres, pdata,
47the way remoteproc_rpmsg.c does this, or, if this becomes prevalent, we
48might also consider using dev_archdata for this).
49
50::
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +020051
52 void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -030053
54Power off a remote processor (previously booted with rproc_boot()).
55In case @rproc is still being used by an additional user(s), then
56this function will just decrement the power refcount and exit,
57without really powering off the device.
58
59Every call to rproc_boot() must (eventually) be accompanied by a call
60to rproc_shutdown(). Calling rproc_shutdown() redundantly is a bug.
61
62.. note::
63
64 we're not decrementing the rproc's refcount, only the power refcount.
65 which means that the @rproc handle stays valid even after
66 rproc_shutdown() returns, and users can still use it with a subsequent
67 rproc_boot(), if needed.
68
69::
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +020070
Dave Gerlachfec47d82015-05-22 15:45:27 -050071 struct rproc *rproc_get_by_phandle(phandle phandle)
Dave Gerlachfec47d82015-05-22 15:45:27 -050072
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -030073Find an rproc handle using a device tree phandle. Returns the rproc
74handle on success, and NULL on failure. This function increments
75the remote processor's refcount, so always use rproc_put() to
76decrement it back once rproc isn't needed anymore.
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +020077
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -030078Typical usage
79=============
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +020080
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -030081::
82
83 #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
84
85 /* in case we were given a valid 'rproc' handle */
86 int dummy_rproc_example(struct rproc *my_rproc)
87 {
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +020088 int ret;
89
90 /* let's power on and boot our remote processor */
91 ret = rproc_boot(my_rproc);
92 if (ret) {
93 /*
94 * something went wrong. handle it and leave.
95 */
96 }
97
98 /*
99 * our remote processor is now powered on... give it some work
100 */
101
102 /* let's shut it down now */
103 rproc_shutdown(my_rproc);
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300104 }
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200105
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300106API for implementors
107====================
108
109::
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200110
111 struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
112 const struct rproc_ops *ops,
113 const char *firmware, int len)
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200114
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300115Allocate a new remote processor handle, but don't register
116it yet. Required parameters are the underlying device, the
117name of this remote processor, platform-specific ops handlers,
118the name of the firmware to boot this rproc with, and the
119length of private data needed by the allocating rproc driver (in bytes).
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200120
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300121This function should be used by rproc implementations during
122initialization of the remote processor.
123
124After creating an rproc handle using this function, and when ready,
125implementations should then call rproc_add() to complete
126the registration of the remote processor.
127
128On success, the new rproc is returned, and on failure, NULL.
129
130.. note::
131
132 **never** directly deallocate @rproc, even if it was not registered
133 yet. Instead, when you need to unroll rproc_alloc(), use rproc_free().
134
135::
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200136
Bjorn Andersson433c0e02016-10-02 17:46:38 -0700137 void rproc_free(struct rproc *rproc)
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300138
139Free an rproc handle that was allocated by rproc_alloc.
140
141This function essentially unrolls rproc_alloc(), by decrementing the
142rproc's refcount. It doesn't directly free rproc; that would happen
143only if there are no other references to rproc and its refcount now
144dropped to zero.
145
146::
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200147
Ohad Ben-Cohen160e7c82012-07-04 16:25:06 +0300148 int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300149
150Register @rproc with the remoteproc framework, after it has been
151allocated with rproc_alloc().
152
153This is called by the platform-specific rproc implementation, whenever
154a new remote processor device is probed.
155
156Returns 0 on success and an appropriate error code otherwise.
157Note: this function initiates an asynchronous firmware loading
158context, which will look for virtio devices supported by the rproc's
159firmware.
160
161If found, those virtio devices will be created and added, so as a result
162of registering this remote processor, additional virtio drivers might get
163probed.
164
165::
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200166
Ohad Ben-Cohen160e7c82012-07-04 16:25:06 +0300167 int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200168
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300169Unroll rproc_add().
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200170
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300171This function should be called when the platform specific rproc
172implementation decides to remove the rproc device. it should
173_only_ be called if a previous invocation of rproc_add()
174has completed successfully.
175
176After rproc_del() returns, @rproc is still valid, and its
177last refcount should be decremented by calling rproc_free().
178
179Returns 0 on success and -EINVAL if @rproc isn't valid.
180
181::
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200182
Fernando Guzman Lugo8afd5192012-08-30 13:26:12 -0500183 void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc, enum rproc_crash_type type)
Fernando Guzman Lugo8afd5192012-08-30 13:26:12 -0500184
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300185Report a crash in a remoteproc
186
187This function must be called every time a crash is detected by the
188platform specific rproc implementation. This should not be called from a
189non-remoteproc driver. This function can be called from atomic/interrupt
190context.
191
192Implementation callbacks
193========================
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200194
195These callbacks should be provided by platform-specific remoteproc
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300196drivers::
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200197
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300198 /**
199 * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
200 * @start: power on the device and boot it
201 * @stop: power off the device
202 * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
203 */
204 struct rproc_ops {
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200205 int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
206 int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
207 void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300208 };
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200209
210Every remoteproc implementation should at least provide the ->start and ->stop
Ohad Ben-Cohen7a186942012-02-13 22:30:39 +0100211handlers. If rpmsg/virtio functionality is also desired, then the ->kick handler
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200212should be provided as well.
213
214The ->start() handler takes an rproc handle and should then power on the
215device and boot it (use rproc->priv to access platform-specific private data).
216The boot address, in case needed, can be found in rproc->bootaddr (remoteproc
217core puts there the ELF entry point).
218On success, 0 should be returned, and on failure, an appropriate error code.
219
220The ->stop() handler takes an rproc handle and powers the device down.
221On success, 0 is returned, and on failure, an appropriate error code.
222
223The ->kick() handler takes an rproc handle, and an index of a virtqueue
224where new message was placed in. Implementations should interrupt the remote
225processor and let it know it has pending messages. Notifying remote processors
226the exact virtqueue index to look in is optional: it is easy (and not
227too expensive) to go through the existing virtqueues and look for new buffers
228in the used rings.
229
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300230Binary Firmware Structure
231=========================
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200232
233At this point remoteproc only supports ELF32 firmware binaries. However,
234it is quite expected that other platforms/devices which we'd want to
235support with this framework will be based on different binary formats.
236
237When those use cases show up, we will have to decouple the binary format
238from the framework core, so we can support several binary formats without
239duplicating common code.
240
241When the firmware is parsed, its various segments are loaded to memory
242according to the specified device address (might be a physical address
243if the remote processor is accessing memory directly).
244
245In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors would
246also include a special section which we call "the resource table".
247
248The resource table contains system resources that the remote processor
249requires before it should be powered on, such as allocation of physically
250contiguous memory, or iommu mapping of certain on-chip peripherals.
251Remotecore will only power up the device after all the resource table's
252requirement are met.
253
254In addition to system resources, the resource table may also contain
255resource entries that publish the existence of supported features
256or configurations by the remote processor, such as trace buffers and
257supported virtio devices (and their configurations).
258
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300259The resource table begins with this header::
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200260
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300261 /**
262 * struct resource_table - firmware resource table header
263 * @ver: version number
264 * @num: number of resource entries
265 * @reserved: reserved (must be zero)
266 * @offset: array of offsets pointing at the various resource entries
267 *
268 * The header of the resource table, as expressed by this structure,
269 * contains a version number (should we need to change this format in the
270 * future), the number of available resource entries, and their offsets
271 * in the table.
272 */
273 struct resource_table {
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200274 u32 ver;
275 u32 num;
276 u32 reserved[2];
277 u32 offset[0];
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300278 } __packed;
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200279
280Immediately following this header are the resource entries themselves,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300281each of which begins with the following resource entry header::
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200282
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300283 /**
284 * struct fw_rsc_hdr - firmware resource entry header
285 * @type: resource type
286 * @data: resource data
287 *
288 * Every resource entry begins with a 'struct fw_rsc_hdr' header providing
289 * its @type. The content of the entry itself will immediately follow
290 * this header, and it should be parsed according to the resource type.
291 */
292 struct fw_rsc_hdr {
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200293 u32 type;
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200294 u8 data[0];
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300295 } __packed;
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200296
297Some resources entries are mere announcements, where the host is informed
298of specific remoteproc configuration. Other entries require the host to
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200299do something (e.g. allocate a system resource). Sometimes a negotiation
300is expected, where the firmware requests a resource, and once allocated,
301the host should provide back its details (e.g. address of an allocated
302memory region).
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200303
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300304Here are the various resource types that are currently supported::
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200305
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300306 /**
307 * enum fw_resource_type - types of resource entries
308 *
309 * @RSC_CARVEOUT: request for allocation of a physically contiguous
310 * memory region.
311 * @RSC_DEVMEM: request to iommu_map a memory-based peripheral.
312 * @RSC_TRACE: announces the availability of a trace buffer into which
313 * the remote processor will be writing logs.
314 * @RSC_VDEV: declare support for a virtio device, and serve as its
315 * virtio header.
316 * @RSC_LAST: just keep this one at the end
317 *
318 * Please note that these values are used as indices to the rproc_handle_rsc
319 * lookup table, so please keep them sane. Moreover, @RSC_LAST is used to
320 * check the validity of an index before the lookup table is accessed, so
321 * please update it as needed.
322 */
323 enum fw_resource_type {
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200324 RSC_CARVEOUT = 0,
325 RSC_DEVMEM = 1,
326 RSC_TRACE = 2,
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200327 RSC_VDEV = 3,
328 RSC_LAST = 4,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300329 };
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200330
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200331For more details regarding a specific resource type, please see its
332dedicated structure in include/linux/remoteproc.h.
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200333
334We also expect that platform-specific resource entries will show up
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200335at some point. When that happens, we could easily add a new RSC_PLATFORM
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200336type, and hand those resources to the platform-specific rproc driver to handle.
337
Mauro Carvalho Chehab620b4702017-05-17 06:31:37 -0300338Virtio and remoteproc
339=====================
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200340
341The firmware should provide remoteproc information about virtio devices
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200342that it supports, and their configurations: a RSC_VDEV resource entry
343should specify the virtio device id (as in virtio_ids.h), virtio features,
344virtio config space, vrings information, etc.
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200345
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200346When a new remote processor is registered, the remoteproc framework
347will look for its resource table and will register the virtio devices
348it supports. A firmware may support any number of virtio devices, and
349of any type (a single remote processor can also easily support several
350rpmsg virtio devices this way, if desired).
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200351
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200352Of course, RSC_VDEV resource entries are only good enough for static
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200353allocation of virtio devices. Dynamic allocations will also be made possible
354using the rpmsg bus (similar to how we already do dynamic allocations of
355rpmsg channels; read more about it in rpmsg.txt).