xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bunmapi
Make sure to only call xfs_iext_get_ext after we've validate the
extent index when moving on to the next index in xfs_bunmapi. Also
remove the old workaround for too large indices that has been
superceeded by the proper fix in xfs_bmap_del_extent.
Based on an earlier patch from Lachlan McIlroy.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
index af655c1..ebcd452 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -5242,17 +5242,17 @@
nodelete:
/*
* If not done go on to the next (previous) record.
- * Reset ep in case the extents array was re-alloced.
*/
- ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
if (bno != (xfs_fileoff_t)-1 && bno >= start) {
- if (lastx >= XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(ip, whichfork) ||
- xfs_bmbt_get_startoff(ep) > bno) {
- if (--lastx >= 0)
- ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
- }
- if (lastx >= 0)
+ if (lastx >= 0) {
+ ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
+ if (xfs_bmbt_get_startoff(ep) > bno) {
+ if (--lastx >= 0)
+ ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp,
+ lastx);
+ }
xfs_bmbt_get_all(ep, &got);
+ }
extno++;
}
}