KVM: PPC: BookE: Handle alignment interrupts
When the guest triggers an alignment interrupt, we don't handle it properly
today and instead BUG_ON(). This really shouldn't happen.
Instead, we should just pass the interrupt back into the guest so it can deal
with it.
Reported-by: Gao Guanhua-B22826 <B22826@freescale.com>
Tested-by: Gao Guanhua-B22826 <B22826@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
index d2f502d..020923e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
@@ -182,6 +182,14 @@
kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu, BOOKE_IRQPRIO_INST_STORAGE);
}
+static void kvmppc_core_queue_alignment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong dear_flags,
+ ulong esr_flags)
+{
+ vcpu->arch.queued_dear = dear_flags;
+ vcpu->arch.queued_esr = esr_flags;
+ kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu, BOOKE_IRQPRIO_ALIGNMENT);
+}
+
void kvmppc_core_queue_program(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong esr_flags)
{
vcpu->arch.queued_esr = esr_flags;
@@ -345,6 +353,7 @@
switch (priority) {
case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DTLB_MISS:
case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DATA_STORAGE:
+ case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_ALIGNMENT:
update_dear = true;
/* fall through */
case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_INST_STORAGE:
@@ -358,7 +367,6 @@
case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SPE_FP_DATA:
case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SPE_FP_ROUND:
case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_AP_UNAVAIL:
- case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_ALIGNMENT:
allowed = 1;
msr_mask = MSR_CE | MSR_ME | MSR_DE;
int_class = INT_CLASS_NONCRIT;
@@ -971,6 +979,12 @@
r = RESUME_GUEST;
break;
+ case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_ALIGNMENT:
+ kvmppc_core_queue_alignment(vcpu, vcpu->arch.fault_dear,
+ vcpu->arch.fault_esr);
+ r = RESUME_GUEST;
+ break;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_HV_SYSCALL:
if (!(vcpu->arch.shared->msr & MSR_PR)) {