um: PTRACE_[GS]ETFPXREGS had been wired on the wrong subarch
It's 32bit-only, not 64bit-only... And while we are at it, it's
set_fpxregs(), not set_fpregs()...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/arch/um/sys-i386/ptrace.c b/arch/um/sys-i386/ptrace.c
index d23b2d3..49fd25a 100644
--- a/arch/um/sys-i386/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/um/sys-i386/ptrace.c
@@ -206,5 +206,17 @@
long subarch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request,
unsigned long addr, unsigned long data)
{
- return -EIO;
+ int ret = -EIO;
+ void __user *datap = (void __user *) data;
+
+ switch (request) {
+ case PTRACE_GETFPXREGS: /* Get the child FPU state. */
+ ret = get_fpxregs(datap, child);
+ break;
+ case PTRACE_SETFPXREGS: /* Set the child FPU state. */
+ ret = set_fpxregs(datap, child);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
}