fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers
Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called
in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and
the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers. Some
file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and
ocfs2. For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make
sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each
individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there.
Thanks,
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/fs/afs/write.c b/fs/afs/write.c
index b806285..9aa52d9 100644
--- a/fs/afs/write.c
+++ b/fs/afs/write.c
@@ -681,9 +681,10 @@
* - the return status from this call provides a reliable indication of
* whether any write errors occurred for this process.
*/
-int afs_fsync(struct file *file, int datasync)
+int afs_fsync(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
{
struct dentry *dentry = file->f_path.dentry;
+ struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
struct afs_writeback *wb, *xwb;
struct afs_vnode *vnode = AFS_FS_I(dentry->d_inode);
int ret;
@@ -692,12 +693,19 @@
vnode->fid.vid, vnode->fid.vnode, dentry->d_name.name,
datasync);
+ ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, start, end);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
+
/* use a writeback record as a marker in the queue - when this reaches
* the front of the queue, all the outstanding writes are either
* completed or rejected */
wb = kzalloc(sizeof(*wb), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!wb)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!wb) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
wb->vnode = vnode;
wb->first = 0;
wb->last = -1;
@@ -720,7 +728,7 @@
if (ret < 0) {
afs_put_writeback(wb);
_leave(" = %d [wb]", ret);
- return ret;
+ goto out;
}
/* wait for the preceding writes to actually complete */
@@ -729,6 +737,8 @@
vnode->writebacks.next == &wb->link);
afs_put_writeback(wb);
_leave(" = %d", ret);
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
return ret;
}