tree 8bc245df2caf0f086a4780180d6ba3863f38e9d1
parent 9ca3ba011b9f1bf7fc73a4e7dc0c9edec2aeb149
author Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> 1426716287 -0700
committer Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> 1426848502 +0100

drm/i915: Move vblank wait determination to 'check' phase

Determining whether we'll need to wait for vblanks is something we
should determine during the atomic 'check' phase, not the 'commit'
phase.  Note that we only set these bits in the branch of 'check' where
intel_crtc->active is true so that we don't try to wait on a disabled
CRTC.

The whole 'wait for vblank after update' flag should go away in the
future, once we start handling watermarks in a proper atomic manner.

This regression has been introduced in

commit 2fdd7def16dd7580f297827930126c16b152ec11
Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 4 10:49:04 2015 -0800
    drm/i915: Don't clobber plane state on internal disables

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Root-cause-analysis-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89550
Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/legacy-planes
Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/legacy-planes-dpms
Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/universal-planes
Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/universal-planes-dpms
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>