reiserfs: cleanup, reformat comments to normal kernel style
This patch reformats comments in the reiserfs code to fit in 80 columns and
to follow the style rules.
There is no functional change but it helps make my eyes bleed less.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c b/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c
index a6ce532..a333a07 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c
@@ -25,8 +25,10 @@
int size = acl ? posix_acl_xattr_size(acl->a_count) : 0;
- /* Pessimism: We can't assume that anything from the xattr root up
- * has been created. */
+ /*
+ * Pessimism: We can't assume that anything from the xattr root up
+ * has been created.
+ */
jcreate_blocks = reiserfs_xattr_jcreate_nblocks(inode) +
reiserfs_xattr_nblocks(inode, size) * 2;
@@ -208,8 +210,10 @@
retval = reiserfs_xattr_get(inode, name, value, size);
if (retval == -ENODATA || retval == -ENOSYS) {
- /* This shouldn't actually happen as it should have
- been caught above.. but just in case */
+ /*
+ * This shouldn't actually happen as it should have
+ * been caught above.. but just in case
+ */
acl = NULL;
} else if (retval < 0) {
acl = ERR_PTR(retval);
@@ -290,8 +294,10 @@
return error;
}
-/* dir->i_mutex: locked,
- * inode is new and not released into the wild yet */
+/*
+ * dir->i_mutex: locked,
+ * inode is new and not released into the wild yet
+ */
int
reiserfs_inherit_default_acl(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
@@ -304,14 +310,18 @@
if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
return 0;
- /* ACLs can only be used on "new" objects, so if it's an old object
- * there is nothing to inherit from */
+ /*
+ * ACLs can only be used on "new" objects, so if it's an old object
+ * there is nothing to inherit from
+ */
if (get_inode_sd_version(dir) == STAT_DATA_V1)
goto apply_umask;
- /* Don't apply ACLs to objects in the .reiserfs_priv tree.. This
+ /*
+ * Don't apply ACLs to objects in the .reiserfs_priv tree.. This
* would be useless since permissions are ignored, and a pain because
- * it introduces locking cycles */
+ * it introduces locking cycles
+ */
if (IS_PRIVATE(dir)) {
inode->i_flags |= S_PRIVATE;
goto apply_umask;