cpufreq: Introduce cpufreq_start_governor()
Starting a governor in cpufreq always follows the same pattern
involving two calls to cpufreq_governor(), one with the event
argument set to CPUFREQ_GOV_START and one with that argument set to
CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS.
Introduce cpufreq_start_governor() that will carry out those two
operations and make all places where governors are started use it.
That slightly modifies the behavior of cpufreq_set_policy() which
now also will go back to the old governor if the second call to
cpufreq_governor() (the one with event equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS)
fails, but that really is how it should work in the first place.
Also cpufreq_resume() will now pring an error message if the
CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS call to cpufreq_governor() fails, but that
makes it follow cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() and cpufreq_offline()
in that respect.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index f870399..43f3912a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
/* internal prototypes */
static int cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event);
static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
+static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
/**
* Two notifier lists: the "policy" list is involved in the
@@ -964,10 +965,7 @@
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
if (has_target()) {
- ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
- if (!ret)
- ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
-
+ ret = cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
}
@@ -1308,10 +1306,7 @@
/* Start governor again for active policy */
if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
if (has_target()) {
- ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
- if (!ret)
- ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
-
+ ret = cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
}
@@ -1591,9 +1586,7 @@
policy);
} else {
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
- ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
- if (!ret)
- cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+ ret = cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (ret)
@@ -1935,6 +1928,14 @@
return ret;
}
+static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+ return ret ? ret : cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+}
+
int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)
{
int err;
@@ -2071,8 +2072,10 @@
return cpufreq_driver->setpolicy(new_policy);
}
- if (new_policy->governor == policy->governor)
- goto out;
+ if (new_policy->governor == policy->governor) {
+ pr_debug("cpufreq: governor limits update\n");
+ return cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+ }
pr_debug("governor switch\n");
@@ -2100,10 +2103,11 @@
policy->governor = new_policy->governor;
ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT);
if (!ret) {
- ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
- if (!ret)
- goto out;
-
+ ret = cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
+ if (!ret) {
+ pr_debug("cpufreq: governor change\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
}
@@ -2114,14 +2118,10 @@
if (cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT))
policy->governor = NULL;
else
- cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+ cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
}
return ret;
-
- out:
- pr_debug("governor: change or update limits\n");
- return cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
}
/**