[NET]: move __dev_addr_discard adjacent to dev_addr_discard for readability
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 17c9cbd..6357f54c 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2715,20 +2715,6 @@
return 0;
}
-static void __dev_addr_discard(struct dev_addr_list **list)
-{
- struct dev_addr_list *tmp;
-
- while (*list != NULL) {
- tmp = *list;
- *list = tmp->next;
- if (tmp->da_users > tmp->da_gusers)
- printk("__dev_addr_discard: address leakage! "
- "da_users=%d\n", tmp->da_users);
- kfree(tmp);
- }
-}
-
/**
* dev_unicast_delete - Release secondary unicast address.
* @dev: device
@@ -2777,6 +2763,20 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_unicast_add);
+static void __dev_addr_discard(struct dev_addr_list **list)
+{
+ struct dev_addr_list *tmp;
+
+ while (*list != NULL) {
+ tmp = *list;
+ *list = tmp->next;
+ if (tmp->da_users > tmp->da_gusers)
+ printk("__dev_addr_discard: address leakage! "
+ "da_users=%d\n", tmp->da_users);
+ kfree(tmp);
+ }
+}
+
static void dev_addr_discard(struct net_device *dev)
{
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);