[CIFS] add mount option to send mandatory rather than advisory locks
Some applications/subsystems require mandatory byte range locks
(as is used for Windows/DOS/OS2 etc). Sending advisory (posix style)
byte range lock requests (instead of mandatory byte range locks) can
lead to problems for these applications (which expect that other
clients be prevented from writing to portions of the file which
they have locked and are updating). This mount option allows
mounting cifs with the new mount option "forcemand" (or
"forcemandatorylock") in order to have the cifs client use mandatory
byte range locks (ie SMB/CIFS/Windows/NTFS style locks) rather than
posix byte range lock requests, even if the server would support
posix byte range lock requests. This has no effect if the server
does not support the CIFS Unix Extensions (since posix style locks
require support for the CIFS Unix Extensions), but for mounts
to Samba servers this can be helpful for Wine and applications
that require mandatory byte range locks.
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
CC: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index f0a81e6..babd27a 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -644,10 +644,10 @@
__u64 length;
bool wait_flag = false;
struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb;
- struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon;
+ struct cifsTconInfo *tcon;
__u16 netfid;
__u8 lockType = LOCKING_ANDX_LARGE_FILES;
- bool posix_locking;
+ bool posix_locking = 0;
length = 1 + pfLock->fl_end - pfLock->fl_start;
rc = -EACCES;
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@
cFYI(1, ("Unknown type of lock"));
cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(file->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
- pTcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
+ tcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
if (file->private_data == NULL) {
FreeXid(xid);
@@ -706,9 +706,10 @@
}
netfid = ((struct cifsFileInfo *)file->private_data)->netfid;
- posix_locking = (cifs_sb->tcon->ses->capabilities & CAP_UNIX) &&
- (CIFS_UNIX_FCNTL_CAP & le64_to_cpu(cifs_sb->tcon->fsUnixInfo.Capability));
-
+ if ((tcon->ses->capabilities & CAP_UNIX) &&
+ (CIFS_UNIX_FCNTL_CAP & le64_to_cpu(tcon->fsUnixInfo.Capability)) &&
+ (cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NOPOSIXBRL == 0))
+ posix_locking = 1;
/* BB add code here to normalize offset and length to
account for negative length which we can not accept over the
wire */
@@ -719,7 +720,7 @@
posix_lock_type = CIFS_RDLCK;
else
posix_lock_type = CIFS_WRLCK;
- rc = CIFSSMBPosixLock(xid, pTcon, netfid, 1 /* get */,
+ rc = CIFSSMBPosixLock(xid, tcon, netfid, 1 /* get */,
length, pfLock,
posix_lock_type, wait_flag);
FreeXid(xid);
@@ -727,10 +728,10 @@
}
/* BB we could chain these into one lock request BB */
- rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, pTcon, netfid, length, pfLock->fl_start,
+ rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, length, pfLock->fl_start,
0, 1, lockType, 0 /* wait flag */ );
if (rc == 0) {
- rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, pTcon, netfid, length,
+ rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, length,
pfLock->fl_start, 1 /* numUnlock */ ,
0 /* numLock */ , lockType,
0 /* wait flag */ );
@@ -767,7 +768,7 @@
if (numUnlock == 1)
posix_lock_type = CIFS_UNLCK;
- rc = CIFSSMBPosixLock(xid, pTcon, netfid, 0 /* set */,
+ rc = CIFSSMBPosixLock(xid, tcon, netfid, 0 /* set */,
length, pfLock,
posix_lock_type, wait_flag);
} else {
@@ -775,7 +776,7 @@
(struct cifsFileInfo *)file->private_data;
if (numLock) {
- rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, pTcon, netfid, length,
+ rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, length,
pfLock->fl_start,
0, numLock, lockType, wait_flag);
@@ -796,7 +797,7 @@
if (pfLock->fl_start <= li->offset &&
(pfLock->fl_start + length) >=
(li->offset + li->length)) {
- stored_rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, pTcon,
+ stored_rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon,
netfid,
li->length, li->offset,
1, 0, li->type, false);