[S390] fix ext2_find_next_bit
ext4 does not work on s390 because ext2_find_next_bit is broken. Fortunately
this function is only used by ext4. The function uses ffs which does not work
analog to ffz. The result of ffs has an offset of 1 which is not taken into
account. To fix this use the low level __ffs_word function directly instead
of the ill defined ffs.
In addition the patch improves find_next_zero_bit and ext2_find_next_zero_bit
by passing the bit offset into __ffz_word instead of adding it after the
function call returned.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h
index b4eb24a..8e9243a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@
* __ffz_word returns __BITOPS_WORDSIZE
* if no zero bit is present in the word.
*/
- set = __ffz_word(0, *p >> bit) + bit;
+ set = __ffz_word(bit, *p >> bit);
if (set >= size)
return size + offset;
if (set < __BITOPS_WORDSIZE)
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@
* s390 version of ffz returns __BITOPS_WORDSIZE
* if no zero bit is present in the word.
*/
- set = ffz(__load_ulong_le(p, 0) >> bit) + bit;
+ set = __ffz_word(bit, __load_ulong_le(p, 0) >> bit);
if (set >= size)
return size + offset;
if (set < __BITOPS_WORDSIZE)
@@ -865,7 +865,7 @@
* s390 version of ffz returns __BITOPS_WORDSIZE
* if no zero bit is present in the word.
*/
- set = ffs(__load_ulong_le(p, 0) >> bit) + bit;
+ set = __ffs_word(0, __load_ulong_le(p, 0) & (~0UL << bit));
if (set >= size)
return size + offset;
if (set < __BITOPS_WORDSIZE)