[DCCP] ccid3: Fix two bugs in sending rate computation
This fixes
1) a bug in the recomputation of the sending rate by the nofeedback
timer when no feedback at all has so far been sent by the receiver:
min_t was used instead of max_t, which is wrong (cf. RFC 3448, p. 10);
2) an error in the computation of larger initial windows: instead of
min(... max()) (cf. RFC 4342, 5.), the code had used max(... max()).
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Acked-by: Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
diff --git a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c
index 92e893e..c54663f 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
switch (hctx->ccid3hctx_state) {
case TFRC_SSTATE_NO_FBACK:
/* RFC 3448, 4.4: Halve send rate directly */
- hctx->ccid3hctx_x = min_t(u32, hctx->ccid3hctx_x / 2,
+ hctx->ccid3hctx_x = max_t(u32, hctx->ccid3hctx_x / 2,
hctx->ccid3hctx_s / TFRC_T_MBI);
ccid3_pr_debug("%s, sk=%p, state=%s, updated tx rate to %d "
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@
if (hctx->ccid3hctx_state == TFRC_SSTATE_NO_FBACK) {
/* Use Larger Initial Windows [RFC 4342, sec. 5]
* We deviate in that we use `s' instead of `MSS'. */
- u16 w_init = max( 4 * hctx->ccid3hctx_s,
+ u16 w_init = min( 4 * hctx->ccid3hctx_s,
max(2 * hctx->ccid3hctx_s, 4380));
hctx->ccid3hctx_rtt = r_sample;
hctx->ccid3hctx_x = usecs_div(w_init, r_sample);