jffs2/jfs/xfs: switch over to 'check_acl' rather than 'permission()'
This avoids an indirect call in the VFS for each path component lookup.
Well, at least as long as you own the directory in question, and the ACL
check is unnecessary.
Reviewed-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/jfs/acl.c b/fs/jfs/acl.c
index a29c7c3..d66477c 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/acl.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/acl.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
return rc;
}
-static int jfs_check_acl(struct inode *inode, int mask)
+int jfs_check_acl(struct inode *inode, int mask)
{
struct posix_acl *acl = jfs_get_acl(inode, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS);
@@ -129,11 +129,6 @@
return -EAGAIN;
}
-int jfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
-{
- return generic_permission(inode, mask, jfs_check_acl);
-}
-
int jfs_init_acl(tid_t tid, struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir)
{
struct posix_acl *acl = NULL;
diff --git a/fs/jfs/file.c b/fs/jfs/file.c
index 7f6063a..2b70fa7 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/file.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
.removexattr = jfs_removexattr,
#ifdef CONFIG_JFS_POSIX_ACL
.setattr = jfs_setattr,
- .permission = jfs_permission,
+ .check_acl = jfs_check_acl,
#endif
};
diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_acl.h b/fs/jfs/jfs_acl.h
index 88475f1..b07bd41 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_acl.h
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_acl.h
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_JFS_POSIX_ACL
-int jfs_permission(struct inode *, int);
+int jfs_check_acl(struct inode *, int);
int jfs_init_acl(tid_t, struct inode *, struct inode *);
int jfs_setattr(struct dentry *, struct iattr *);
diff --git a/fs/jfs/namei.c b/fs/jfs/namei.c
index 514ee2e..c79a4270 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/namei.c
@@ -1543,7 +1543,7 @@
.removexattr = jfs_removexattr,
#ifdef CONFIG_JFS_POSIX_ACL
.setattr = jfs_setattr,
- .permission = jfs_permission,
+ .check_acl = jfs_check_acl,
#endif
};