drm/i915: s/i915_wait_request/i915_wait_seqno/g
Wait request is poorly named IMO. After working with these functions for
some time, I feel it's much clearer to name the functions more
appropriately.
Of course we must update the callers to use the new name as well.
This leaves room within our namespace for a *real* wait request function
at some point.
Note to maintainer: this patch is optional.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 8ac10e8..a17e31e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1315,8 +1315,8 @@
int __must_check i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
struct drm_file *file,
struct drm_i915_gem_request *request);
-int __must_check i915_wait_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
- uint32_t seqno);
+int __must_check i915_wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
+ uint32_t seqno);
int i915_gem_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf);
int __must_check
i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,