diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-footbridge/cats-pci.c b/arch/arm/mach-footbridge/cats-pci.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4f984fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-footbridge/cats-pci.c
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+/*
+ * linux/arch/arm/mach-footbridge/cats-pci.c
+ *
+ * PCI bios-type initialisation for PCI machines
+ *
+ * Bits taken from various places.
+ */
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+
+#include <asm/irq.h>
+#include <asm/mach/pci.h>
+#include <asm/mach-types.h>
+
+/* cats host-specific stuff */
+static int irqmap_cats[] __initdata = { IRQ_PCI, IRQ_IN0, IRQ_IN1, IRQ_IN3 };
+
+static int __init cats_map_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
+{
+	if (dev->irq >= 128)
+		return dev->irq & 0x1f;
+
+	if (dev->irq >= 1 && dev->irq <= 4)
+		return irqmap_cats[dev->irq - 1];
+
+	if (dev->irq != 0)
+		printk("PCI: device %02x:%02x has unknown irq line %x\n",
+		       dev->bus->number, dev->devfn, dev->irq);
+
+	return -1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * why not the standard PCI swizzle?  does this prevent 4-port tulip
+ * cards being used (ie, pci-pci bridge based cards)?
+ */
+static struct hw_pci cats_pci __initdata = {
+	.swizzle		= NULL,
+	.map_irq		= cats_map_irq,
+	.nr_controllers		= 1,
+	.setup			= dc21285_setup,
+	.scan			= dc21285_scan_bus,
+	.preinit		= dc21285_preinit,
+	.postinit		= dc21285_postinit,
+};
+
+static int cats_pci_init(void)
+{
+	if (machine_is_cats())
+		pci_common_init(&cats_pci);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+subsys_initcall(cats_pci_init);