netfilter: cttimeout: put back l4proto when replacing timeout policy
We forget to call nf_ct_l4proto_put when replacing the existing
timeout policy. Acctually, there's no need to get ct l4proto
before doing replace, so we can move it to a later position.
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <liping.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
index f74fee1..6844c7a 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
@@ -98,31 +98,28 @@
break;
}
- l4proto = nf_ct_l4proto_find_get(l3num, l4num);
-
- /* This protocol is not supportted, skip. */
- if (l4proto->l4proto != l4num) {
- ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
- goto err_proto_put;
- }
-
if (matching) {
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE) {
/* You cannot replace one timeout policy by another of
* different kind, sorry.
*/
if (matching->l3num != l3num ||
- matching->l4proto->l4proto != l4num) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto err_proto_put;
- }
+ matching->l4proto->l4proto != l4num)
+ return -EINVAL;
- ret = ctnl_timeout_parse_policy(&matching->data,
- l4proto, net,
- cda[CTA_TIMEOUT_DATA]);
- return ret;
+ return ctnl_timeout_parse_policy(&matching->data,
+ matching->l4proto, net,
+ cda[CTA_TIMEOUT_DATA]);
}
- ret = -EBUSY;
+
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ l4proto = nf_ct_l4proto_find_get(l3num, l4num);
+
+ /* This protocol is not supportted, skip. */
+ if (l4proto->l4proto != l4num) {
+ ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto err_proto_put;
}