fs: protect inode->i_state with inode->i_lock

Protect inode state transitions and validity checks with the
inode->i_lock. This enables us to make inode state transitions
independently of the inode_lock and is the first step to peeling
away the inode_lock from the code.

This requires that __iget() is done atomically with i_state checks
during list traversals so that we don't race with another thread
marking the inode I_FREEING between the state check and grabbing the
reference.

Also remove the unlock_new_inode() memory barrier optimisation
required to avoid taking the inode_lock when clearing I_NEW.
Simplify the code by simply taking the inode->i_lock around the
state change and wakeup. Because the wakeup is no longer tricky,
remove the wake_up_inode() function and open code the wakeup where
necessary.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
index 4c29fcf..4dd53fb 100644
--- a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
+++ b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
@@ -254,8 +254,11 @@
 		 * I_WILL_FREE, or I_NEW which is fine because by that point
 		 * the inode cannot have any associated watches.
 		 */
-		if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE|I_NEW))
+		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+		if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE|I_NEW)) {
+			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * If i_count is zero, the inode cannot have any watches and
@@ -263,8 +266,10 @@
 		 * evict all inodes with zero i_count from icache which is
 		 * unnecessarily violent and may in fact be illegal to do.
 		 */
-		if (!atomic_read(&inode->i_count))
+		if (!atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {
+			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		need_iput_tmp = need_iput;
 		need_iput = NULL;
@@ -274,13 +279,17 @@
 			__iget(inode);
 		else
 			need_iput_tmp = NULL;
+		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 
 		/* In case the dropping of a reference would nuke next_i. */
 		if ((&next_i->i_sb_list != list) &&
-		    atomic_read(&next_i->i_count) &&
-		    !(next_i->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE))) {
-			__iget(next_i);
-			need_iput = next_i;
+		    atomic_read(&next_i->i_count)) {
+			spin_lock(&next_i->i_lock);
+			if (!(next_i->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE))) {
+				__iget(next_i);
+				need_iput = next_i;
+			}
+			spin_unlock(&next_i->i_lock);
 		}
 
 		/*