drivers/perf: arm_pmu: Always consider IRQ0 as an error
As declared by the chief penguin, and enforced by the NO_IRQ brigade,
IRQ0 doesn't exist, and is considered as an error (no irq).
Unfortunately, the arm_pmu driver still considers it as valid in
a large number of cases. Let's fix this.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index c494613..193a68c 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@
irqs = min(pmu_device->num_resources, num_possible_cpus());
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
- if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+ if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
on_each_cpu_mask(&cpu_pmu->supported_cpus,
cpu_pmu_disable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1);
free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@
if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs))
continue;
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
- if (irq >= 0)
+ if (irq > 0)
free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
}
}
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@
}
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
- if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+ if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
&hw_events->percpu_pmu);
if (err) {
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@
/* Check the IRQ type and prohibit a mix of PPIs and SPIs */
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
- if (irq >= 0) {
+ if (irq > 0) {
bool spi = !irq_is_percpu(irq);
if (i > 0 && spi != using_spi) {
@@ -969,8 +969,7 @@
if (cpumask_weight(&pmu->supported_cpus) == 0) {
int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
- /* If using PPIs, check the affinity of the partition */
+ if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
int ret;
ret = irq_get_percpu_devid_partition(irq, &pmu->supported_cpus);