jbd2: Fix the wrong calculation of t_max_wait in update_t_max_wait
t_max_wait is added in commit 8e85fb3f to indicate how long we
were waiting for new transaction to start. In commit 6d0bf005,
it is moved to another function named update_t_max_wait to
avoid a build warning. But the wrong thing is that the original
'ts' is initialized in the start of function start_this_handle
and we can calculate t_max_wait in the right way. while with
this change, ts is initialized within the function and t_max_wait
can never be calculated right.
This patch moves the initialization of ts to the original beginning
of start_this_handle and pass it to function update_t_max_wait so
that it can be calculated right and the build warning is avoided also.
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index 05fa77a..85a055e 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
*/
/*
- * Update transiaction's maximum wait time, if debugging is enabled.
+ * Update transaction's maximum wait time, if debugging is enabled.
*
* In order for t_max_wait to be reliable, it must be protected by a
* lock. But doing so will mean that start_this_handle() can not be
@@ -91,11 +91,10 @@
* means that maximum wait time reported by the jbd2_run_stats
* tracepoint will always be zero.
*/
-static inline void update_t_max_wait(transaction_t *transaction)
+static inline void update_t_max_wait(transaction_t *transaction,
+ unsigned long ts)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG
- unsigned long ts = jiffies;
-
if (jbd2_journal_enable_debug &&
time_after(transaction->t_start, ts)) {
ts = jbd2_time_diff(ts, transaction->t_start);
@@ -121,6 +120,7 @@
tid_t tid;
int needed, need_to_start;
int nblocks = handle->h_buffer_credits;
+ unsigned long ts = jiffies;
if (nblocks > journal->j_max_transaction_buffers) {
printk(KERN_ERR "JBD: %s wants too many credits (%d > %d)\n",
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@
/* OK, account for the buffers that this operation expects to
* use and add the handle to the running transaction.
*/
- update_t_max_wait(transaction);
+ update_t_max_wait(transaction, ts);
handle->h_transaction = transaction;
atomic_inc(&transaction->t_updates);
atomic_inc(&transaction->t_handle_count);