drm/i915: Name the lrc irq handler correctly
We consistently use the _irq_handler postfix for functions called in
hardirq context. Especially when it's a non-static function hardirq is
a crazy enough calling context to warrant this level of ocd. So rename
it.
Cc: Thomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index a82020e..89b5577 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -474,13 +474,13 @@
}
/**
- * intel_execlists_handle_ctx_events() - handle Context Switch interrupts
+ * intel_lrc_irq_handler() - handle Context Switch interrupts
* @ring: Engine Command Streamer to handle.
*
* Check the unread Context Status Buffers and manage the submission of new
* contexts to the ELSP accordingly.
*/
-void intel_execlists_handle_ctx_events(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
+void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
u32 status_pointer;