cpufreq: tegra: update comment for clarity
Tegra's driver got updated a bit (00917dd cpufreq: Tegra: implement intermediate
frequency callbacks) and implements new 'intermediate freq' infrastructure of
core. Above commit updated comments about when to call
clk_prepare_enable(pll_x_clk) and Doug wasn't satisfied with those comments and
said this:
> The "Though when target-freq is intermediate freq, we don't need to
> take this reference." makes me think that this function is actually
> called when target-freq is intermediate freq. I don't think it is,
> right?
For better clarity just make that comment more explicit about when we call
tegra_target_intermediate().
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reported-and-reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
index a5fbc0a..8084c7f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
@@ -71,9 +71,12 @@
/*
* Take an extra reference to the main pll so it doesn't turn
* off when we move the cpu off of it as enabling it again while we
- * switch to it from tegra_target() would take additional time. Though
- * when target-freq is intermediate freq, we don't need to take this
- * reference.
+ * switch to it from tegra_target() would take additional time.
+ *
+ * When target-freq is equal to intermediate freq we don't need to
+ * switch to an intermediate freq and so this routine isn't called.
+ * Also, we wouldn't be using pll_x anymore and must not take extra
+ * reference to it, as it can be disabled now to save some power.
*/
clk_prepare_enable(pll_x_clk);