sh: fix seq_file memory leak
When using single_open(), single_release() should be used instead
of seq_release(), otherwise there is a memory leak.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/cache-debugfs.c b/arch/sh/mm/cache-debugfs.c
index c5b56d5..0e189cc 100644
--- a/arch/sh/mm/cache-debugfs.c
+++ b/arch/sh/mm/cache-debugfs.c
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
.open = cache_debugfs_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
- .release = seq_release,
+ .release = single_release,
};
static int __init cache_debugfs_init(void)
diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c b/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c
index 46911bc..cef7276 100644
--- a/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c
+++ b/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@
.open = pmb_debugfs_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
- .release = seq_release,
+ .release = single_release,
};
static int __init pmb_debugfs_init(void)