[INET]: Small cleanup for xxx_put after evictor consolidation
After the evictor code is consolidated there is no need in
passing the extra pointer to the xxx_put() functions.
The only place when it made sense was the evictor code itself.
Maybe this change must got with the previous (or with the
next) patch, but I try to make them shorter as much as
possible to simplify the review (but they are still large
anyway), so this change goes in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
index ee6e041..6676600 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -155,10 +155,10 @@
/* Destruction primitives. */
-static __inline__ void ipq_put(struct ipq *ipq, int *work)
+static __inline__ void ipq_put(struct ipq *ipq)
{
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ipq->q.refcnt))
- inet_frag_destroy(&ipq->q, &ip4_frags, work);
+ inet_frag_destroy(&ipq->q, &ip4_frags, NULL);
}
/* Kill ipq entry. It is not destroyed immediately,
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@
}
out:
spin_unlock(&qp->q.lock);
- ipq_put(qp, NULL);
+ ipq_put(qp);
}
/* Creation primitives. */
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
atomic_inc(&qp->q.refcnt);
write_unlock(&ip4_frags.lock);
qp_in->q.last_in |= COMPLETE;
- ipq_put(qp_in, NULL);
+ ipq_put(qp_in);
return qp;
}
}
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@
ret = ip_frag_queue(qp, skb);
spin_unlock(&qp->q.lock);
- ipq_put(qp, NULL);
+ ipq_put(qp);
return ret;
}