[INET]: Small cleanup for xxx_put after evictor consolidation
After the evictor code is consolidated there is no need in
passing the extra pointer to the xxx_put() functions.
The only place when it made sense was the evictor code itself.
Maybe this change must got with the previous (or with the
next) patch, but I try to make them shorter as much as
possible to simplify the review (but they are still large
anyway), so this change goes in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
index 02e4e85..98d8fbd 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
@@ -169,10 +169,10 @@
/* Destruction primitives. */
-static __inline__ void fq_put(struct frag_queue *fq, int *work)
+static __inline__ void fq_put(struct frag_queue *fq)
{
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fq->q.refcnt))
- inet_frag_destroy(&fq->q, &ip6_frags, work);
+ inet_frag_destroy(&fq->q, &ip6_frags, NULL);
}
/* Kill fq entry. It is not destroyed immediately,
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
if (dev)
dev_put(dev);
spin_unlock(&fq->q.lock);
- fq_put(fq, NULL);
+ fq_put(fq);
}
/* Creation primitives. */
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
atomic_inc(&fq->q.refcnt);
write_unlock(&ip6_frags.lock);
fq_in->q.last_in |= COMPLETE;
- fq_put(fq_in, NULL);
+ fq_put(fq_in);
return fq;
}
}
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@
ret = ip6_frag_queue(fq, skb, fhdr, IP6CB(skb)->nhoff);
spin_unlock(&fq->q.lock);
- fq_put(fq, NULL);
+ fq_put(fq);
return ret;
}